uncertainty: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concern
Weight: 0.67
, confusion
Weight: 0.65
, issue
Weight: 0.64
, change
Weight: 0.63
Siblings randomness
Weight: 0.57
, tension
Weight: 0.33
, crisis
Weight: 0.33
, panic
Weight: 0.32
, weakness
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality better 0.94
has quality worse 0.84
improve quality 0.84
improve quality of life 0.83
be good for business 0.80
be good for us 0.80
be considered good 0.77
be as good as rest 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(change, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(uncertainty, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(change, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(uncertainty, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(confusion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(uncertainty, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(confusion, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(uncertainty, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(change, be as good as rest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(uncertainty, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(uncertainty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(confusion, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(uncertainty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(confusion, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(uncertainty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(change, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(uncertainty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(change, be as good as rest)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(uncertainty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(change, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.58
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(uncertainty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(confusion, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(uncertainty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(change, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(uncertainty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(change, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(uncertainty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(confusion, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(uncertainty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(change, be as good as rest)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(uncertainty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(weakness, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(uncertainty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(weakness, has quality worse)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(change, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(uncertainty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(uncertainty, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(confusion, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(uncertainty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(uncertainty, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(change, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(uncertainty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(uncertainty, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(confusion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(uncertainty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(uncertainty, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(change, be as good as rest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(uncertainty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(uncertainty, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(uncertainty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(weakness, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(weakness, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(uncertainty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(weakness, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(weakness, has quality worse)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(uncertainty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(uncertainty, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(uncertainty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(uncertainty, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(uncertainty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(uncertainty, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(uncertainty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(uncertainty, has quality bad)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(uncertainty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(uncertainty, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(uncertainty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(uncertainty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(uncertainty, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(uncertainty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(uncertainty, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(uncertainty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(confusion, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(uncertainty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(change, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(uncertainty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(confusion, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(uncertainty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(change, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(uncertainty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(change, be as good as rest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(uncertainty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(weakness, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(uncertainty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(weakness, has quality worse)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(uncertainty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(confusion, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(uncertainty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(change, be as good as rest)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(uncertainty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(confusion, has quality bad)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(uncertainty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(change, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(uncertainty, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(change, has quality good)