weakness: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents trait
Weight: 0.63
, issue
Weight: 0.62
, symptom
Weight: 0.62
, problem
Weight: 0.61
Siblings defense
Weight: 0.61
, selfishness
Weight: 0.60
, vanity
Weight: 0.57
, decline
Weight: 0.34
, thyroid problem
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality worse 0.87
has quality wrong 0.87
has quality evil 0.80
is bad thing 0.79
be poor in npb 0.77
has quality sin 0.76
be considered bad thing 0.76
has quality definition 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(symptom, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(weakness, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(weakness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(symptom, has quality worse)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(weakness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(symptom, has quality worse)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(weakness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(selfishness, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(weakness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(defense, be poor in npb)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(weakness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(vanity, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(weakness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(decline, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(weakness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(selfishness, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(weakness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(defense, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(weakness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(selfishness, has quality wrong)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(weakness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(selfishness, be considered bad thing)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(weakness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(selfishness, has quality evil)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(weakness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(vanity, has quality sin)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(weakness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(vanity, is bad thing)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(weakness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(selfishness, has quality sin)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(symptom, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(weakness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(weakness, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(weakness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(selfishness, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(selfishness, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(weakness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(selfishness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(selfishness, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(weakness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(defense, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(defense, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(weakness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(selfishness, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(selfishness, has quality wrong)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(weakness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(selfishness, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(selfishness, has quality evil)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(weakness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(vanity, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(vanity, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(weakness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(vanity, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(vanity, is bad thing)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(weakness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(selfishness, has quality sin)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(selfishness, has quality sin)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(weakness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(defense, be poor in npb)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(defense, be poor in npb)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(weakness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(selfishness, be considered bad thing)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(selfishness, be considered bad thing)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(weakness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(vanity, has quality sin)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(vanity, has quality sin)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(weakness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(decline, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(decline, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(weakness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(weakness, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(weakness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(weakness, has quality worse)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(weakness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(weakness, has quality worse)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(weakness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(weakness, has quality worse)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(weakness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(weakness, has quality worse)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(weakness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(weakness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(weakness, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(weakness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(weakness, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(weakness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(symptom, has quality worse)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(weakness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(selfishness, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(weakness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(selfishness, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(weakness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(selfishness, has quality sin)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(weakness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(selfishness, be considered bad thing)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(weakness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(selfishness, has quality wrong)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(weakness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(selfishness, has quality evil)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(weakness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(vanity, has quality sin)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(weakness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(defense, be poor in npb)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(weakness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(vanity, is bad thing)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(weakness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(defense, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(weakness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(vanity, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(weakness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(decline, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(weakness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(symptom, has quality worse)