understanding: has quality good

Related concepts

Parents	element Weight: 0.64 , way Weight: 0.62 , activity Weight: 0.60 , expression Weight: 0.60
Siblings	insight Weight: 0.56 , learning Weight: 0.33 , belief Weight: 0.33 , passion Weight: 0.33 , dimension Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality good	1.00
be important improving	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(expression, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(understanding, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(understanding, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Plausible(expression, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(understanding, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(expression, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(understanding, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(dimension, has quality good)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(understanding, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(learning, has quality good)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(understanding, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(passion, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(expression, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

Remarkable(understanding, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Plausible(understanding, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(understanding, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

Remarkable(passion, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Plausible(passion, has quality good)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(understanding, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(learning, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(learning, has quality good)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(understanding, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

Remarkable(dimension, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(dimension, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(understanding, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Salient(understanding, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.86

Salient(understanding, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Salient(understanding, be important improving)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.73

Typical(understanding, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Typical(understanding, be important improving)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(understanding, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Plausible(understanding, be important improving)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.75

Remarkable(understanding, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(understanding, be important improving)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.86

Salient(understanding, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(understanding, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(understanding, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(understanding, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(understanding, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(understanding, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(expression, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(understanding, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Typical(passion, has quality good)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(understanding, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(learning, has quality good)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(understanding, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(dimension, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.73

Typical(understanding, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(expression, has quality good)