underwear: has physical part pockets

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents garment
Weight: 0.61
, item
Weight: 0.61
, gift
Weight: 0.59
, product
Weight: 0.58
Siblings thong
Weight: 0.62
, bra
Weight: 0.54
, basque
Weight: 0.46
, lingerie
Weight: 0.36
, pantyhose
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part pockets 1.00
have little pockets 0.91
has physical part pocket 0.89
have little pocket 0.81
has physical part region 0.78
has physical part hole 0.78
has physical part holes 0.76
has physical part pouch 0.76
has physical part pads 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(underwear, has physical part pockets)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(thong, has physical part pockets)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(underwear, has physical part pockets)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(thong, has physical part pocket)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(underwear, has physical part pockets)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(thong, have little pockets)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(underwear, has physical part pockets)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(basque, has physical part region)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(underwear, has physical part pockets)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(bra, has physical part pads)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(underwear, has physical part pockets)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(thong, has physical part pouch)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(underwear, has physical part pockets)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(thong, has physical part pockets)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(thong, has physical part pockets)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(underwear, has physical part pockets)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(thong, have little pockets)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(thong, have little pockets)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(underwear, has physical part pockets)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(thong, has physical part pocket)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(thong, has physical part pocket)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(underwear, has physical part pockets)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(basque, has physical part region)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(basque, has physical part region)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(underwear, has physical part pockets)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(bra, has physical part pads)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(bra, has physical part pads)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(underwear, has physical part pockets)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(thong, has physical part pouch)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(thong, has physical part pouch)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(underwear, has physical part pockets)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(underwear, has physical part pockets)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(underwear, has physical part pockets)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(underwear, has physical part pocket)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(underwear, has physical part pockets)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(underwear, has physical part pocket)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(underwear, has physical part pockets)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(underwear, has physical part pocket)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(underwear, has physical part pockets)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(underwear, has physical part pocket)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(underwear, has physical part pockets)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(underwear, has physical part holes)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(underwear, has physical part pockets)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(underwear, has physical part hole)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(underwear, has physical part pockets)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(underwear, has physical part hole)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(underwear, has physical part pockets)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(underwear, has physical part holes)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(underwear, has physical part pockets)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(underwear, has physical part hole)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(underwear, has physical part pockets)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(underwear, has physical part holes)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(underwear, has physical part pockets)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(underwear, has physical part holes)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(underwear, has physical part pockets)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(underwear, has physical part hole)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(underwear, has physical part pockets)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(underwear, have little pockets)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(underwear, has physical part pockets)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(underwear, has physical part pouch)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(underwear, has physical part pockets)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(underwear, has physical part pouch)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(underwear, has physical part pockets)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(underwear, has physical part pouch)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(underwear, has physical part pockets)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(underwear, has physical part pouch)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(underwear, has physical part pockets)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(underwear, have little pockets)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(underwear, has physical part pockets)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(underwear, have little pockets)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(underwear, has physical part pockets)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(underwear, have little pocket)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(underwear, has physical part pockets)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(underwear, have little pocket)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(underwear, has physical part pockets)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(underwear, have little pockets)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(underwear, has physical part pockets)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(underwear, have little pocket)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(underwear, has physical part pockets)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(underwear, have little pocket)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(underwear, has physical part pockets)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(underwear, has physical part pockets)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(underwear, has physical part pockets)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(underwear, has physical part pockets)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(underwear, has physical part pockets)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(underwear, has physical part pockets)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(thong, has physical part pockets)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(underwear, has physical part pockets)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(thong, has physical part pocket)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(underwear, has physical part pockets)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(thong, have little pockets)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(underwear, has physical part pockets)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(basque, has physical part region)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(underwear, has physical part pockets)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(thong, has physical part pouch)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(underwear, has physical part pockets)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(bra, has physical part pads)