union: be bad for employers

Property	Similarity
be bad for employers	1.00
be bad for employees	0.84
be good for workers	0.83
be good for employees	0.82
protect bad workers	0.79
be important for workers	0.79
protect bad employees	0.79
be important for young workers	0.78
be important for day workers	0.77
benefit workers	0.77

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.65

Typical(union, be bad for employers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Typical(union, be good for employees)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.65

Typical(union, be bad for employers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Typical(union, be good for workers)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.65

Typical(union, be bad for employers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Typical(union, be bad for employees)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(union, be bad for employers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Plausible(union, be bad for employees)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(union, be bad for employers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Plausible(union, be good for employees)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(union, be bad for employers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(union, be good for workers)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.65

Typical(union, be bad for employers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(union, be important for young workers)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.57

Salient(union, be bad for employers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Salient(union, be bad for employees)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.57

Salient(union, be bad for employers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Salient(union, be good for workers)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.53

Remarkable(union, be bad for employers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(union, be bad for employees)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.57

Salient(union, be bad for employers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Salient(union, be good for employees)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(union, be bad for employers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(union, be important for young workers)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.53

Remarkable(union, be bad for employers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(union, be good for workers)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.57

Salient(union, be bad for employers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Salient(union, be important for young workers)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.53

Remarkable(union, be bad for employers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(union, be important for young workers)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.53

Remarkable(union, be bad for employers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(union, be good for employees)

Parents	city Weight: 0.61 , club Weight: 0.61 , county Weight: 0.59 , institution Weight: 0.59 , party Weight: 0.59
Siblings	labor Weight: 0.34 , labour party Weight: 0.33 , quebec city Weight: 0.33 , political party Weight: 0.33

union: be bad for employers

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible