union: help workers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents city
Weight: 0.61
, club
Weight: 0.61
, county
Weight: 0.59
, institution
Weight: 0.59
, party
Weight: 0.59
Siblings labor
Weight: 0.34
, labour party
Weight: 0.33
, quebec city
Weight: 0.33
, political party
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
help workers 1.00
be important for workers 0.94
be good for workers 0.94
benefit workers 0.92
be important for day workers 0.91
protect workers 0.91
be important for young workers 0.90
protect bad workers 0.89
be very important to workers 0.88
be important for present day workers 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(union, help workers)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(union, help workers)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(union, help workers)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(union, be good for workers)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(union, help workers)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(union, be important for young workers)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(union, help workers)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(union, be good for workers)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(union, help workers)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(union, be important for young workers)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(union, help workers)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(union, be good for workers)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(union, help workers)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(union, be good for workers)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(union, help workers)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(union, be important for young workers)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(union, help workers)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(union, be important for young workers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(union, help workers)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(union, help workers)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(union, help workers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(union, help workers)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(union, help workers)