union: is command economy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents city
Weight: 0.61
, club
Weight: 0.61
, county
Weight: 0.59
, institution
Weight: 0.59
, party
Weight: 0.59
Siblings labor
Weight: 0.34
, quebec city
Weight: 0.33
, political party
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is command economy 1.00
be bad for economy 0.77
was general mcclellan ineffective as military commander 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(union, is command economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(union, is command economy)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(union, is command economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(union, was general mcclellan ineffective as military commander)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(union, is command economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(union, be bad for economy)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(union, is command economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(union, was general mcclellan ineffective as military commander)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(union, is command economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(union, be bad for economy)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(union, is command economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(union, was general mcclellan ineffective as military commander)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(union, is command economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(union, be bad for economy)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(union, is command economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(union, be bad for economy)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(union, is command economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(union, was general mcclellan ineffective as military commander)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(union, is command economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(union, is command economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(union, is command economy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(union, is command economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(union, is command economy)