union: was general mcclellan ineffective as military commander

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents city
Weight: 0.61
, club
Weight: 0.61
, county
Weight: 0.59
, institution
Weight: 0.59
, party
Weight: 0.59
Siblings labor
Weight: 0.34
, quebec city
Weight: 0.33
, political party
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
was general mcclellan ineffective as military commander 1.00
is command economy 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(union, was general mcclellan ineffective as military commander)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(union, was general mcclellan ineffective as military commander)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(union, was general mcclellan ineffective as military commander)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(union, is command economy)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(union, was general mcclellan ineffective as military commander)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(union, is command economy)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(union, was general mcclellan ineffective as military commander)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(union, is command economy)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(union, was general mcclellan ineffective as military commander)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(union, is command economy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(union, was general mcclellan ineffective as military commander)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(union, was general mcclellan ineffective as military commander)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(union, was general mcclellan ineffective as military commander)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(union, was general mcclellan ineffective as military commander)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(union, was general mcclellan ineffective as military commander)