union: were formed during industrial revolution

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents city
Weight: 0.61
, club
Weight: 0.61
, county
Weight: 0.59
, institution
Weight: 0.59
, party
Weight: 0.59
Siblings labor
Weight: 0.34
, labour party
Weight: 0.33
, quebec city
Weight: 0.33
, political party
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
were formed during industrial revolution 1.00
were formed during revolution 0.94
were formed 0.78
were formed in late 19th century 0.78
were formed in late century 0.78
were formed in 19th century 0.77
were formed in century 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(party, were formed)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(union, were formed during industrial revolution)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(union, were formed during industrial revolution)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(party, were formed)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(union, were formed during industrial revolution)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(party, were formed)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(union, were formed during industrial revolution)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(political party, were formed)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(party, were formed)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(union, were formed during industrial revolution)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(union, were formed during industrial revolution)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(union, were formed during industrial revolution)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(political party, were formed)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(political party, were formed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(union, were formed during industrial revolution)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(union, were formed during industrial revolution)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(union, were formed during industrial revolution)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(union, were formed)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(union, were formed during industrial revolution)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(union, were formed)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(union, were formed during industrial revolution)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(union, were formed in late 19th century)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(union, were formed during industrial revolution)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(union, were formed in late 19th century)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(union, were formed during industrial revolution)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(union, were formed)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(union, were formed during industrial revolution)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(union, were formed in late 19th century)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(union, were formed during industrial revolution)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(union, were formed in late 19th century)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(union, were formed during industrial revolution)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(union, were formed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(union, were formed during industrial revolution)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(union, were formed during industrial revolution)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(union, were formed during industrial revolution)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(union, were formed during industrial revolution)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(union, were formed during industrial revolution)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(union, were formed during industrial revolution)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(party, were formed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(union, were formed during industrial revolution)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(political party, were formed)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(union, were formed during industrial revolution)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(party, were formed)