university: have bad reputation

Related concepts

Parents	college Weight: 0.68 , institute Weight: 0.68 , public school Weight: 0.67 , campus Weight: 0.67 , community Weight: 0.67
Siblings	cambridge Weight: 0.68 , secondary school Weight: 0.63 , oxford Weight: 0.63 , auburn Weight: 0.58 , ub Weight: 0.44

Related properties

Property	Similarity
have bad reputation	1.00
have reputation	0.97
has quality good	0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.94

Plausible(public school, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(university, have bad reputation)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(college, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(university, have bad reputation)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(institute, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(university, have bad reputation)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(university, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(institute, has quality good)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(university, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Plausible(college, has quality good)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(university, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Plausible(public school, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(university, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(public school, has quality good)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(university, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(institute, has quality good)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(university, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(college, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(university, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(auburn, has quality good)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(university, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(oxford, has quality good)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(university, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(cambridge, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.94

Plausible(public school, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

Remarkable(university, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(university, have bad reputation)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(college, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

Remarkable(university, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(university, have bad reputation)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(institute, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

Remarkable(university, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(university, have bad reputation)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(university, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

Remarkable(oxford, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(oxford, has quality good)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(university, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

Remarkable(cambridge, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Plausible(cambridge, has quality good)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(university, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

Remarkable(auburn, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Plausible(auburn, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(university, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Salient(university, have bad reputation)

Similarity expansion

0.77

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.89

Typical(university, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(university, have reputation)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(university, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(university, have reputation)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.80

Salient(university, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Salient(university, have reputation)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.89

Typical(university, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(university, has quality good)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(university, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Plausible(university, has quality good)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.80

Salient(university, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Salient(university, has quality good)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.49

Remarkable(university, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(university, have reputation)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.49

Remarkable(university, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(university, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.80

Salient(university, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(university, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(university, have bad reputation)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(university, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(university, have bad reputation)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(university, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(institute, has quality good)

0.22

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(university, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(college, has quality good)

0.21

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(university, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(public school, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(university, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(oxford, has quality good)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(university, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(cambridge, has quality good)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(university, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(auburn, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.89

Typical(university, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(institute, has quality good)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.89

Typical(university, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(college, has quality good)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.89

Typical(university, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(public school, has quality good)