up: be in louisville

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hit
Weight: 0.58
, direction
Weight: 0.58
, process
Weight: 0.56
, organization
Weight: 0.56
Siblings down
Weight: 0.35
, out
Weight: 0.33
, away
Weight: 0.32
, back
Weight: 0.32
, big bang
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in louisville 1.00
be in michigan 0.80
be part of michigan 0.79
go through kentucky 0.79
be awful in philly 0.76
be available from york to paris france 0.75
be available from york york to paris france 0.75
be shit in nrl 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(direction, be available from york to paris france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(up, be in louisville)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(direction, be available from york york to paris france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(up, be in louisville)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(up, be in louisville) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(direction, be available from york to paris france)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(up, be in louisville) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(direction, be available from york york to paris france)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(up, be in louisville) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(direction, be available from york york to paris france)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(up, be in louisville) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(direction, be available from york to paris france)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(up, be in louisville) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(back, be shit in nrl)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(direction, be available from york to paris france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(up, be in louisville) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(up, be in louisville)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(direction, be available from york york to paris france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(up, be in louisville) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(up, be in louisville)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(up, be in louisville) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(back, be shit in nrl) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(back, be shit in nrl)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(up, be in louisville) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(up, be in louisville)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(up, be in louisville) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(up, be awful in philly)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(up, be in louisville) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(up, be awful in philly)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(up, be in louisville) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(up, be awful in philly)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(up, be in louisville) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(up, be awful in philly)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(up, be in louisville) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(up, be in michigan)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(up, be in louisville) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(up, be in louisville) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(up, be in louisville)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(up, be in louisville) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(up, be in louisville)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(up, be in louisville) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(direction, be available from york to paris france)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(up, be in louisville) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(direction, be available from york york to paris france)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(up, be in louisville) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(back, be shit in nrl)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(up, be in louisville) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(direction, be available from york to paris france)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(up, be in louisville) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(direction, be available from york york to paris france)