up: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hit
Weight: 0.58
, direction
Weight: 0.58
, process
Weight: 0.56
, organization
Weight: 0.56
Siblings down
Weight: 0.35
, out
Weight: 0.33
, away
Weight: 0.32
, back
Weight: 0.32
, big bang
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
is quality 0.91
has quality change 0.86
is low quality 0.84
is great 0.81
has quality systems 0.80
be good company work for 0.78
is great company 0.78
be good company work 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(process, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(up, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(hit, is low quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(up, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(hit, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(up, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(up, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(hit, is quality)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(up, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(process, is quality)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(up, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(hit, is low quality)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(up, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(hit, is low quality)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(up, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(hit, is quality)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(up, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(process, is quality)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(process, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(up, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(up, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(hit, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(up, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(up, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(hit, is low quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(up, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(up, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(up, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(up, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(up, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(up, has quality bad)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(up, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(up, has quality bad)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(up, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(up, has quality bad)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(up, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(up, has quality bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(up, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(up, be good company work for)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(up, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(up, be good company work for)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(up, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(up, be good company work for)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(up, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(up, be good company work for)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(up, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(up, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(up, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(up, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(up, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(up, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(hit, is quality)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(up, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(process, is quality)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(up, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(hit, is low quality)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(up, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(hit, is quality)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(up, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(process, is quality)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(up, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(hit, is low quality)