up: be good company work for

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hit
Weight: 0.58
, direction
Weight: 0.58
, process
Weight: 0.56
, organization
Weight: 0.56
Siblings down
Weight: 0.35
, out
Weight: 0.33
, away
Weight: 0.32
, back
Weight: 0.32
, big bang
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good company work for 1.00
be good company work 0.99
is great company 0.91
has state company 0.84
be important in business 0.81
be in business 0.80
serve as example of firm 0.79
work 0.79
be related to good 0.78
has quality good 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(process, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(up, be good company work for)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(organization, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(up, be good company work for)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(organization, work)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(up, be good company work for)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(hit, work)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(up, be good company work for)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(process, work)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(up, be good company work for)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(up, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(process, work)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(up, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(hit, work)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(up, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(organization, work)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(up, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(organization, be important in business)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(up, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(process, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(up, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(hit, work)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(up, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(process, be important in business)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(up, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(organization, be important in business)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(up, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(organization, work)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(up, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(process, work)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(up, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(away, work)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(process, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(up, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(up, be good company work for)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(organization, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(up, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(up, be good company work for)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(organization, work)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(up, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(up, be good company work for)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(hit, work)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(up, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(up, be good company work for)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(process, work)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(up, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(up, be good company work for)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(up, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(away, work)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(away, work)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(up, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(up, be good company work for)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(up, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(up, be in business)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(up, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(up, be related to good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(up, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(up, has quality good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(up, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(up, be in business)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(up, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(up, be in business)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(up, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(up, be related to good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(up, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(up, be related to good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(up, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(up, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(up, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(up, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(up, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(up, be in business)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(up, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(up, be related to good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(up, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(up, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(up, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(up, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(up, be good company work for)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(up, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(up, be good company work for)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(up, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(process, work)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(up, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(hit, work)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(up, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(organization, work)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(up, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(organization, be important in business)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(up, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(process, be important in business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(up, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(away, work)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(up, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(process, work)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(up, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(hit, work)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(up, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(organization, work)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(up, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(organization, be important in business)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(up, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(process, be important in business)