up: be related to good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hit
Weight: 0.58
, direction
Weight: 0.58
, process
Weight: 0.56
, organization
Weight: 0.56
Siblings down
Weight: 0.35
, out
Weight: 0.33
, away
Weight: 0.32
, back
Weight: 0.32
, big bang
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related to good 1.00
be related 0.91
be good company work for 0.78
be good company work 0.76
has quality good 0.76
has quality bad 0.76
is great 0.75
be related to direction 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(process, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(up, be related to good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(direction, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(up, be related to good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(direction, be related to direction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(up, be related to good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(up, be related to good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(direction, be related)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(up, be related to good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(process, be related)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(up, be related to good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(direction, be related to direction)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(up, be related to good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(process, be related)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(up, be related to good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(direction, be related)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(up, be related to good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(direction, be related to direction)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(up, be related to good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(down, be related)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(process, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(up, be related to good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(up, be related to good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(direction, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(up, be related to good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(up, be related to good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(direction, be related to direction) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(up, be related to good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(up, be related to good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(up, be related to good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(down, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(down, be related)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(up, be related to good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(up, be related to good)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(up, be related to good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(up, has quality bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(up, be related to good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(up, has quality bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(up, be related to good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(up, has quality bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(up, be related to good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(up, be good company work for)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(up, be related to good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(up, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(up, be related to good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(up, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(up, be related to good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(up, be good company work for)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(up, be related to good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(up, be good company work for)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(up, be related to good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(up, be good company work for)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(up, be related to good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(up, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(up, be related to good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(up, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(up, be related to good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(up, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(up, be related to good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(up, be related to good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(up, be related to good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(up, be related to good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(up, be related to good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(up, be related to good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(direction, be related to direction)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(up, be related to good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(direction, be related)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(up, be related to good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(process, be related)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(up, be related to good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(down, be related)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(up, be related to good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(direction, be related)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(up, be related to good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(process, be related)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(up, be related to good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(direction, be related to direction)