utensil: be vs metal

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents item
Weight: 0.66
, cooking
Weight: 0.52
, object
Weight: 0.52
Siblings wooden spoon
Weight: 0.77
, spoon
Weight: 0.74
, razor blade
Weight: 0.70
, frying pan
Weight: 0.64
, scissors
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be vs metal 1.00
be vs plastic 0.91
is metal 0.82
be made of metal 0.78
be made up of metal 0.78
made of metal 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be vs metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(frying pan, be made of metal)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be vs metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(scissors, be made of metal)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be vs metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(spoon, is metal)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be vs metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(spoon, be made of metal)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(utensil, be vs metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(frying pan, be made of metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(frying pan, be made of metal)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(utensil, be vs metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(spoon, is metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(spoon, is metal)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(utensil, be vs metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(scissors, be made of metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(scissors, be made of metal)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(utensil, be vs metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(spoon, be made of metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(spoon, be made of metal)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(utensil, be vs metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(utensil, be vs metal)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(utensil, be vs metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(utensil, is metal)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(utensil, be vs metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(utensil, is metal)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(utensil, be vs metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(utensil, is metal)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(utensil, be vs metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be made of metal)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(utensil, be vs metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(utensil, be made of metal)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(utensil, be vs metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(utensil, made of metal)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(utensil, be vs metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(utensil, made of metal)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(utensil, be vs metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(utensil, be made of metal)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(utensil, be vs metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(utensil, made of metal)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(utensil, be vs metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(utensil, is metal)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(utensil, be vs metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be vs plastic)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(utensil, be vs metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(utensil, be vs plastic)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(utensil, be vs metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(utensil, made of metal)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(utensil, be vs metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(utensil, be made up of metal)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(utensil, be vs metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(utensil, be made of metal)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(utensil, be vs metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(utensil, be made up of metal)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(utensil, be vs metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(utensil, be made up of metal)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(utensil, be vs metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be made up of metal)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(utensil, be vs metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(utensil, be vs plastic)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(utensil, be vs metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(utensil, be vs plastic)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(utensil, be vs metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(utensil, be vs metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be vs metal)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(utensil, be vs metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(utensil, be vs metal)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be vs metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(spoon, is metal)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be vs metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(frying pan, be made of metal)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be vs metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(scissors, be made of metal)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be vs metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(spoon, be made of metal)