utensil: be vs plastic

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents item
Weight: 0.66
, cooking
Weight: 0.52
, object
Weight: 0.52
Siblings wooden spoon
Weight: 0.77
, spoon
Weight: 0.74
, razor blade
Weight: 0.70
, frying pan
Weight: 0.64
, scissors
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be vs plastic 1.00
be vs metal 0.91
be made of plastic 0.80
be have plastic surgery 0.78
have made of wood plastic 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(utensil, be vs plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(utensil, be vs plastic)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(utensil, be vs plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(utensil, be vs metal)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(utensil, be vs plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(utensil, be vs metal)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(utensil, be vs plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(utensil, be have plastic surgery)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(utensil, be vs plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(utensil, be have plastic surgery)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(utensil, be vs plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be have plastic surgery)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(utensil, be vs plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(utensil, be vs metal)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(utensil, be vs plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be vs metal)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(utensil, be vs plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(utensil, be have plastic surgery)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(utensil, be vs plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(utensil, be made of plastic)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(utensil, be vs plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be made of plastic)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(utensil, be vs plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(utensil, be made of plastic)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(utensil, be vs plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(utensil, be made of plastic)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(utensil, be vs plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(utensil, have made of wood plastic)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(utensil, be vs plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(utensil, have made of wood plastic)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(utensil, be vs plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(utensil, have made of wood plastic)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(utensil, be vs plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(utensil, have made of wood plastic)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(utensil, be vs plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(utensil, be vs plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be vs plastic)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(utensil, be vs plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(utensil, be vs plastic)