utensil: have copper base

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents item
Weight: 0.66
, cooking
Weight: 0.52
, object
Weight: 0.52
Siblings wooden spoon
Weight: 0.77
, spoon
Weight: 0.74
, razor blade
Weight: 0.70
, frying pan
Weight: 0.64
, scissors
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
have copper base 1.00
be made of copper 0.90
made up of copper 0.89
have copper bottom 0.89
be made up of metals 0.79
be made from metals 0.79
be made of metals 0.79
is metal 0.77
be made of metal 0.76
be made up of metal 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(utensil, have copper base)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(frying pan, be made of metal)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(utensil, have copper base)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(scissors, be made of metal)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(utensil, have copper base)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(spoon, be made of metal)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(utensil, have copper base)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(spoon, is metal)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(utensil, have copper base)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(spoon, is metal)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(spoon, is metal)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(utensil, have copper base)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(frying pan, be made of metal)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(frying pan, be made of metal)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(utensil, have copper base)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(scissors, be made of metal)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(scissors, be made of metal)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(utensil, have copper base)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(spoon, be made of metal)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(spoon, be made of metal)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(utensil, have copper base)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(utensil, have copper base)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(utensil, have copper base)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(utensil, be made of copper)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(utensil, have copper base)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(utensil, made up of copper)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(utensil, have copper base)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(utensil, have copper bottom)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(utensil, have copper base)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(utensil, be made of copper)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(utensil, have copper base)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(utensil, made up of copper)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(utensil, have copper base)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(utensil, have copper bottom)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(utensil, have copper base)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(utensil, be made of copper)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(utensil, have copper base)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(utensil, made up of copper)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(utensil, have copper base)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(utensil, have copper bottom)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(utensil, have copper base)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(utensil, be made up of metals)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(utensil, have copper base)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(utensil, be made from metals)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(utensil, have copper base)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(utensil, be made of metals)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(utensil, have copper base)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(utensil, be made up of metals)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(utensil, have copper base)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(utensil, be made from metals)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(utensil, have copper base)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(utensil, be made of metals)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(utensil, have copper base)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(utensil, is metal)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(utensil, have copper base)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(utensil, be made from metals)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(utensil, have copper base)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(utensil, be made up of metals)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(utensil, have copper base)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(utensil, is metal)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(utensil, have copper base)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(utensil, be made of metals)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(utensil, have copper base)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(utensil, is metal)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(utensil, have copper base)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(utensil, be made of metal)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(utensil, have copper base)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(utensil, be made of metal)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(utensil, have copper base)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(utensil, be made up of metal)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(utensil, have copper base)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(utensil, be made of metal)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(utensil, have copper base)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(utensil, be made up of metal)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(utensil, have copper base)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(utensil, be made up of metal)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(utensil, have copper base)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be made of copper)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(utensil, have copper base)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(utensil, is metal)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(utensil, have copper base)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be made of metal)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(utensil, have copper base)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(utensil, have copper bottom)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(utensil, have copper base)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(utensil, made up of copper)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(utensil, have copper base)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be made up of metal)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(utensil, have copper base)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be made of metals)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(utensil, have copper base)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be made from metals)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(utensil, have copper base)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be made up of metals)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(utensil, have copper base)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(utensil, have copper base)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(utensil, have copper base)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(utensil, have copper base)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(utensil, have copper base)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(utensil, have copper base)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(frying pan, be made of metal)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(utensil, have copper base)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(scissors, be made of metal)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(utensil, have copper base)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(spoon, is metal)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(utensil, have copper base)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(spoon, be made of metal)