utensil: have copper bottom

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents item
Weight: 0.66
, cooking
Weight: 0.52
, object
Weight: 0.52
Siblings wooden spoon
Weight: 0.77
, spoon
Weight: 0.74
, razor blade
Weight: 0.70
, frying pan
Weight: 0.64
, scissors
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
have copper bottom 1.00
be made of copper 0.90
have copper base 0.89
made up of copper 0.89
is metal 0.78
be made up of metals 0.77
be made of metals 0.77
be made from metals 0.77
is stainless steel 0.76
be made of stainless steel 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(utensil, have copper bottom)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(spoon, is metal)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(utensil, have copper bottom)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(spoon, be made of stainless steel)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(utensil, have copper bottom)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(spoon, is metal)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(spoon, is metal)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(utensil, have copper bottom)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(spoon, be made of stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(spoon, be made of stainless steel)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(utensil, have copper bottom)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(utensil, have copper bottom)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(utensil, have copper bottom)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(utensil, be made of copper)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(utensil, have copper bottom)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(utensil, have copper base)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(utensil, have copper bottom)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(utensil, made up of copper)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(utensil, have copper bottom)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(utensil, be made of copper)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(utensil, have copper bottom)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(utensil, have copper base)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(utensil, have copper bottom)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(utensil, made up of copper)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(utensil, have copper bottom)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(utensil, be made of copper)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(utensil, have copper bottom)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(utensil, have copper base)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(utensil, have copper bottom)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(utensil, made up of copper)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(utensil, have copper bottom)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(utensil, be made up of metals)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(utensil, have copper bottom)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(utensil, is metal)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(utensil, have copper bottom)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(utensil, be made from metals)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(utensil, have copper bottom)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(utensil, be made of metals)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(utensil, have copper bottom)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(utensil, is metal)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(utensil, have copper bottom)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(utensil, is metal)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(utensil, have copper bottom)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(utensil, be made up of metals)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(utensil, have copper bottom)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(utensil, be made from metals)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(utensil, have copper bottom)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(utensil, be made up of metals)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(utensil, have copper bottom)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(utensil, be made of metals)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(utensil, have copper bottom)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(utensil, be made from metals)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(utensil, have copper bottom)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(utensil, be made of metals)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(utensil, have copper bottom)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(utensil, is stainless steel)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(utensil, have copper bottom)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(utensil, be made of stainless steel)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(utensil, have copper bottom)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(utensil, be made of stainless steel)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(utensil, have copper bottom)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(utensil, is stainless steel)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(utensil, have copper bottom)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be made of copper)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(utensil, have copper bottom)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(utensil, is metal)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(utensil, have copper bottom)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(utensil, be made of stainless steel)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(utensil, have copper bottom)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(utensil, is stainless steel)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(utensil, have copper bottom)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(utensil, have copper base)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(utensil, have copper bottom)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(utensil, made up of copper)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(utensil, have copper bottom)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be made of stainless steel)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(utensil, have copper bottom)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(utensil, is stainless steel)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(utensil, have copper bottom)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be made of metals)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(utensil, have copper bottom)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be made from metals)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(utensil, have copper bottom)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be made up of metals)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(utensil, have copper bottom)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(utensil, have copper bottom)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(utensil, have copper bottom)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(utensil, have copper bottom)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(utensil, have copper bottom)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(utensil, have copper bottom)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(spoon, is metal)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(utensil, have copper bottom)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(spoon, be made of stainless steel)