utensil: is stainless steel

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents item
Weight: 0.66
, cooking
Weight: 0.52
, object
Weight: 0.52
Siblings wooden spoon
Weight: 0.77
, spoon
Weight: 0.74
, razor blade
Weight: 0.70
, frying pan
Weight: 0.64
, scissors
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
is stainless steel 1.00
be made of stainless steel 0.99
is steel 0.93
be made of steel 0.90
be made of aluminum 0.85
is metal 0.81
made of metal 0.78
be made of metal 0.78
have made of wood plastic 0.76
be made of copper 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(utensil, is stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(spoon, be made of steel)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(utensil, is stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(spoon, be made of stainless steel)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(utensil, is stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(frying pan, be made of metal)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(utensil, is stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(scissors, be made of metal)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(utensil, is stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(spoon, be made of metal)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(utensil, is stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(spoon, is metal)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(utensil, is stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(spoon, be made of stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(spoon, be made of stainless steel)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(utensil, is stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(spoon, be made of steel)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(spoon, be made of steel)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(utensil, is stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(spoon, is metal)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(spoon, is metal)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(utensil, is stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(frying pan, be made of metal)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(frying pan, be made of metal)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(utensil, is stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(scissors, be made of metal)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(scissors, be made of metal)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(utensil, is stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(spoon, be made of metal)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(spoon, be made of metal)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(utensil, is stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(utensil, is stainless steel)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(utensil, is stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(utensil, be made of stainless steel)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(utensil, is stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(utensil, be made of stainless steel)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(utensil, is stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(utensil, be made of stainless steel)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(utensil, is stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(utensil, is steel)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(utensil, is stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(utensil, is steel)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(utensil, is stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(utensil, is steel)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(utensil, is stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(utensil, be made of steel)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(utensil, is stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(utensil, be made of steel)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(utensil, is stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(utensil, be made of steel)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(utensil, is stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(utensil, be made of aluminum)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(utensil, is stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(utensil, be made of aluminum)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(utensil, is stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(utensil, is metal)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(utensil, is stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(utensil, is metal)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(utensil, is stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be made of steel)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(utensil, is stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(utensil, is metal)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(utensil, is stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(utensil, be made of aluminum)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(utensil, is stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(utensil, made of metal)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(utensil, is stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(utensil, made of metal)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(utensil, is stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(utensil, be made of metal)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(utensil, is stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(utensil, be made of metal)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(utensil, is stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be made of stainless steel)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(utensil, is stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(utensil, made of metal)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(utensil, is stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(utensil, be made of metal)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(utensil, is stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(utensil, is steel)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(utensil, is stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(utensil, have made of wood plastic)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(utensil, is stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(utensil, be made of copper)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(utensil, is stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(utensil, is metal)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(utensil, is stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(utensil, be made of copper)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(utensil, is stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(utensil, have made of wood plastic)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(utensil, is stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(utensil, be made of copper)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(utensil, is stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(utensil, have made of wood plastic)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(utensil, is stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be made of metal)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(utensil, is stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(utensil, made of metal)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(utensil, is stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be made of aluminum)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(utensil, is stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be made of copper)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(utensil, is stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(utensil, have made of wood plastic)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(utensil, is stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(utensil, is stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(utensil, is stainless steel)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(utensil, is stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(utensil, is stainless steel)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(utensil, is stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(spoon, be made of steel)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(utensil, is stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(spoon, is metal)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(utensil, is stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(frying pan, be made of metal)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(utensil, is stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(scissors, be made of metal)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(utensil, is stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(spoon, be made of metal)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(utensil, is stainless steel)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(spoon, be made of stainless steel)