vacuum cleaner: has state job

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents vacuum
Weight: 0.76
, household appliance
Weight: 0.72
, noise
Weight: 0.66
, machine
Weight: 0.66
Siblings upright
Weight: 0.52
, dishwasher
Weight: 0.35
, water heater
Weight: 0.35
, dryer
Weight: 0.35
, clothes dryer
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state job 1.00
job 0.93
has state jobs 0.88
is job description 0.79
has state problem 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(vacuum, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(vacuum cleaner, has state job)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(vacuum, job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(vacuum cleaner, has state job)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(vacuum cleaner, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(vacuum, has state job)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(vacuum cleaner, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(vacuum, job)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(vacuum, has state job)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(vacuum, job)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(dishwasher, has state jobs)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(vacuum, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(vacuum cleaner, has state job)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(vacuum, job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(vacuum cleaner, has state job)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(vacuum cleaner, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(dishwasher, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(dishwasher, has state jobs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(vacuum cleaner, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(vacuum cleaner, has state job)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(vacuum cleaner, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(vacuum cleaner, has state jobs)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(vacuum cleaner, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(vacuum cleaner, has state jobs)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(vacuum cleaner, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(vacuum cleaner, has state jobs)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, has state jobs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(vacuum cleaner, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(vacuum cleaner, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, has state job)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(vacuum cleaner, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(vacuum cleaner, has state job)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(vacuum, has state job)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(vacuum, job)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(dishwasher, has state jobs)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(vacuum cleaner, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(vacuum, has state job)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(vacuum cleaner, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(vacuum, job)