vacuum cleaner: has state jobs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents vacuum
Weight: 0.76
, household appliance
Weight: 0.72
, noise
Weight: 0.66
, machine
Weight: 0.66
Siblings upright
Weight: 0.52
, dishwasher
Weight: 0.35
, water heater
Weight: 0.35
, dryer
Weight: 0.35
, clothes dryer
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state jobs 1.00
has state job 0.88
job 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(vacuum, has state job)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(vacuum cleaner, has state jobs)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(vacuum, job)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(vacuum cleaner, has state jobs)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(vacuum cleaner, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(vacuum, has state job)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(vacuum cleaner, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(vacuum, job)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(vacuum, has state job)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(vacuum, job)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(dishwasher, has state jobs)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(vacuum, has state job)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(vacuum cleaner, has state jobs)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(vacuum, job)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(vacuum cleaner, has state jobs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(vacuum cleaner, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(dishwasher, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(dishwasher, has state jobs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(vacuum cleaner, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(vacuum cleaner, has state jobs)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(vacuum cleaner, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(vacuum cleaner, has state job)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, has state job)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(vacuum cleaner, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(vacuum cleaner, has state job)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(vacuum cleaner, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(vacuum cleaner, has state job)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(vacuum cleaner, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(vacuum cleaner, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, has state jobs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(vacuum cleaner, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(vacuum cleaner, has state jobs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(vacuum, has state job)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(vacuum, job)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(dishwasher, has state jobs)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(vacuum cleaner, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(vacuum, has state job)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(vacuum cleaner, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(vacuum, job)