vacuum cleaner: have filters

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents vacuum
Weight: 0.76
, household appliance
Weight: 0.72
, noise
Weight: 0.66
, machine
Weight: 0.66
Siblings upright
Weight: 0.52
, dishwasher
Weight: 0.35
, water heater
Weight: 0.35
, dryer
Weight: 0.35
, clothes dryer
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
have filters 1.00
need filters 0.98
need filter 0.91
use water to filter air 0.86
have lint filters 0.85
be related to filtration 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(vacuum, have filters)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(vacuum cleaner, have filters)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(vacuum, need filters)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(vacuum cleaner, have filters)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(vacuum, need filter)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(vacuum cleaner, have filters)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(vacuum cleaner, have filters)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(vacuum, have filters)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(vacuum cleaner, have filters)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(vacuum, need filters)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(vacuum cleaner, have filters)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(vacuum, need filter)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, have filters)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(vacuum, need filter)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, have filters)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(vacuum, need filters)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, have filters)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(vacuum, have filters)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, have filters)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(dryer, have lint filters)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(vacuum, have filters)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, have filters)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(vacuum cleaner, have filters)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(vacuum, need filters)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, have filters)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(vacuum cleaner, have filters)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(vacuum, need filter)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, have filters)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(vacuum cleaner, have filters)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(vacuum cleaner, have filters)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(dryer, have lint filters)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(dryer, have lint filters)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(vacuum cleaner, have filters)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(vacuum cleaner, have filters)

Similarity expansion

0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, have filters)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, need filters)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, have filters)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, need filter)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(vacuum cleaner, have filters)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(vacuum cleaner, use water to filter air)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, have filters)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, use water to filter air)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(vacuum cleaner, have filters)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(vacuum cleaner, need filter)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(vacuum cleaner, have filters)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(vacuum cleaner, need filters)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, have filters)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, be related to filtration)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(vacuum cleaner, have filters)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(vacuum cleaner, use water to filter air)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(vacuum cleaner, have filters)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(vacuum cleaner, use water to filter air)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(vacuum cleaner, have filters)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(vacuum cleaner, need filters)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(vacuum cleaner, have filters)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(vacuum cleaner, need filter)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(vacuum cleaner, have filters)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(vacuum cleaner, need filters)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(vacuum cleaner, have filters)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(vacuum cleaner, need filter)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(vacuum cleaner, have filters)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(vacuum cleaner, be related to filtration)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(vacuum cleaner, have filters)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(vacuum cleaner, be related to filtration)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(vacuum cleaner, have filters)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(vacuum cleaner, be related to filtration)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(vacuum cleaner, have filters)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(vacuum cleaner, have filters)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, have filters)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(vacuum cleaner, have filters)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(vacuum cleaner, have filters)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, have filters)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(vacuum, have filters)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, have filters)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(vacuum, need filters)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, have filters)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(vacuum, need filter)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, have filters)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(dryer, have lint filters)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(vacuum cleaner, have filters)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(vacuum, have filters)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(vacuum cleaner, have filters)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(vacuum, need filters)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(vacuum cleaner, have filters)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(vacuum, need filter)