vacuum cleaner: be related to filtration

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents vacuum
Weight: 0.76
, household appliance
Weight: 0.72
, noise
Weight: 0.66
, machine
Weight: 0.66
Siblings upright
Weight: 0.52
, dishwasher
Weight: 0.35
, water heater
Weight: 0.35
, dryer
Weight: 0.35
, clothes dryer
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related to filtration 1.00
use water to filter air 0.80
have filters 0.78
need filters 0.77
need filter 0.77
be in condenser 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(vacuum, need filter)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(vacuum cleaner, be related to filtration)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(vacuum, need filters)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(vacuum cleaner, be related to filtration)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(vacuum, have filters)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(vacuum cleaner, be related to filtration)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(vacuum, be in condenser)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(vacuum cleaner, be related to filtration)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(vacuum cleaner, be related to filtration)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(vacuum, be in condenser)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(vacuum cleaner, be related to filtration)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(vacuum, have filters)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(vacuum cleaner, be related to filtration)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(vacuum, need filters)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(vacuum cleaner, be related to filtration)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(vacuum, need filter)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, be related to filtration)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(vacuum, be in condenser)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, be related to filtration)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(vacuum, need filter)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, be related to filtration)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(vacuum, need filters)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, be related to filtration)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(vacuum, have filters)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(vacuum, need filters)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, be related to filtration)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(vacuum cleaner, be related to filtration)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(vacuum, need filter)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, be related to filtration)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(vacuum cleaner, be related to filtration)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(vacuum, have filters)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, be related to filtration)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(vacuum cleaner, be related to filtration)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(vacuum, be in condenser)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, be related to filtration)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(vacuum cleaner, be related to filtration)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(vacuum cleaner, be related to filtration)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(vacuum cleaner, be related to filtration)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(vacuum cleaner, be related to filtration)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(vacuum cleaner, use water to filter air)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(vacuum cleaner, be related to filtration)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(vacuum cleaner, have filters)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, be related to filtration)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, use water to filter air)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(vacuum cleaner, be related to filtration)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(vacuum cleaner, use water to filter air)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, be related to filtration)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, need filters)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, be related to filtration)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, have filters)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, be related to filtration)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, need filter)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(vacuum cleaner, be related to filtration)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(vacuum cleaner, have filters)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(vacuum cleaner, be related to filtration)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(vacuum cleaner, use water to filter air)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(vacuum cleaner, be related to filtration)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(vacuum cleaner, need filter)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(vacuum cleaner, be related to filtration)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(vacuum cleaner, have filters)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(vacuum cleaner, be related to filtration)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(vacuum cleaner, need filters)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(vacuum cleaner, be related to filtration)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(vacuum cleaner, need filter)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(vacuum cleaner, be related to filtration)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(vacuum cleaner, need filter)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(vacuum cleaner, be related to filtration)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(vacuum cleaner, need filters)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(vacuum cleaner, be related to filtration)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(vacuum cleaner, need filters)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(vacuum cleaner, be related to filtration)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(vacuum cleaner, be related to filtration)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, be related to filtration)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(vacuum cleaner, be related to filtration)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(vacuum cleaner, be related to filtration)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, be related to filtration)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(vacuum, have filters)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, be related to filtration)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(vacuum, be in condenser)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, be related to filtration)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(vacuum, need filters)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, be related to filtration)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(vacuum, need filter)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(vacuum cleaner, be related to filtration)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(vacuum, have filters)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(vacuum cleaner, be related to filtration)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(vacuum, be in condenser)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(vacuum cleaner, be related to filtration)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(vacuum, need filters)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(vacuum cleaner, be related to filtration)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(vacuum, need filter)