vacuum: be full bad for performance

Related concepts

Parents	environment Weight: 0.64 , atmosphere Weight: 0.62 , method Weight: 0.62 , factor Weight: 0.58
Siblings	vacuum cleaner Weight: 0.76 , outer space Weight: 0.62 , friction Weight: 0.32 , clean room Weight: 0.32 , refrigeration Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be full bad for performance	1.00
has quality bad	0.78
has quality good	0.77
has quality better	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(method, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(vacuum, be full bad for performance)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(atmosphere, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(vacuum, be full bad for performance)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(vacuum, be full bad for performance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Plausible(method, has quality bad)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(vacuum, be full bad for performance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Plausible(atmosphere, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(vacuum, be full bad for performance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(method, has quality bad)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(vacuum, be full bad for performance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(atmosphere, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(vacuum, be full bad for performance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(friction, has quality good)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(vacuum, be full bad for performance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, has quality good)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(vacuum, be full bad for performance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(refrigeration, has quality good)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(vacuum, be full bad for performance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(friction, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(method, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

Remarkable(vacuum, be full bad for performance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Plausible(vacuum, be full bad for performance)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(atmosphere, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

Remarkable(vacuum, be full bad for performance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Plausible(vacuum, be full bad for performance)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(vacuum, be full bad for performance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

Remarkable(friction, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Plausible(friction, has quality good)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(vacuum, be full bad for performance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(friction, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Plausible(friction, has quality bad)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(vacuum, be full bad for performance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

Remarkable(refrigeration, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(refrigeration, has quality good)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(vacuum, be full bad for performance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(vacuum cleaner, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(vacuum, be full bad for performance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Salient(vacuum, be full bad for performance)

Similarity expansion

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.13

Remarkable(vacuum, be full bad for performance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Remarkable(vacuum, has quality good)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.13

Remarkable(vacuum, be full bad for performance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Remarkable(vacuum, has quality bad)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.17

Salient(vacuum, be full bad for performance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Salient(vacuum, has quality good)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.17

Salient(vacuum, be full bad for performance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Salient(vacuum, has quality bad)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.13

Remarkable(vacuum, be full bad for performance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Remarkable(vacuum, has quality better)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.51

Typical(vacuum, be full bad for performance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(vacuum, has quality good)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.51

Typical(vacuum, be full bad for performance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Typical(vacuum, has quality bad)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(vacuum, be full bad for performance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Plausible(vacuum, has quality good)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.51

Typical(vacuum, be full bad for performance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(vacuum, has quality better)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.17

Salient(vacuum, be full bad for performance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Salient(vacuum, has quality better)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(vacuum, be full bad for performance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Plausible(vacuum, has quality bad)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(vacuum, be full bad for performance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Plausible(vacuum, has quality better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.17

Salient(vacuum, be full bad for performance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(vacuum, be full bad for performance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(vacuum, be full bad for performance)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(vacuum, be full bad for performance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(vacuum, be full bad for performance)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(vacuum, be full bad for performance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(atmosphere, has quality good)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(vacuum, be full bad for performance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(method, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(vacuum, be full bad for performance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Typical(friction, has quality good)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(vacuum, be full bad for performance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Typical(friction, has quality bad)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(vacuum, be full bad for performance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(vacuum cleaner, has quality good)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(vacuum, be full bad for performance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(refrigeration, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.51

Typical(vacuum, be full bad for performance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(atmosphere, has quality good)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.51

Typical(vacuum, be full bad for performance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(method, has quality bad)