vacuum: has quality better

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents environment
Weight: 0.64
, atmosphere
Weight: 0.62
, method
Weight: 0.62
, factor
Weight: 0.58
Siblings vacuum cleaner
Weight: 0.76
, outer space
Weight: 0.62
, friction
Weight: 0.32
, clean room
Weight: 0.32
, refrigeration
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality better 1.00
has quality good 0.94
has quality bad 0.90
be full bad for performance 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(atmosphere, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(vacuum, has quality better)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(method, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(vacuum, has quality better)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(vacuum, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(atmosphere, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(vacuum, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(method, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(vacuum, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(method, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(vacuum, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(atmosphere, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(vacuum, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(friction, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(vacuum, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(vacuum, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(refrigeration, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(vacuum, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(friction, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(atmosphere, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(vacuum, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(vacuum, has quality better)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(method, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(vacuum, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(vacuum, has quality better)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(vacuum, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(friction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(friction, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(vacuum, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(friction, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(friction, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(vacuum, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(refrigeration, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(refrigeration, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(vacuum, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(vacuum cleaner, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(vacuum cleaner, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(vacuum, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(vacuum, has quality better)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(vacuum, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(vacuum, has quality good)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(vacuum, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(vacuum, has quality good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(vacuum, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(vacuum, has quality good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(vacuum, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(vacuum, has quality good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(vacuum, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(vacuum, has quality bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(vacuum, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(vacuum, has quality bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(vacuum, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(vacuum, has quality bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(vacuum, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(vacuum, has quality bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(vacuum, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(vacuum, be full bad for performance)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(vacuum, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(vacuum, be full bad for performance)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(vacuum, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(vacuum, be full bad for performance)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(vacuum, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(vacuum, be full bad for performance)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(vacuum, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(vacuum, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(vacuum, has quality better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(vacuum, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(vacuum, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(vacuum, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(atmosphere, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(vacuum, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(method, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(vacuum, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(friction, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(vacuum, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(friction, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(vacuum, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(vacuum cleaner, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(vacuum, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(refrigeration, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(vacuum, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(atmosphere, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(vacuum, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(method, has quality bad)