valley: be formed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents river
Weight: 0.62
, area
Weight: 0.62
, tree
Weight: 0.56
, thing
Weight: 0.55
, place
Weight: 0.52
Siblings death valley
Weight: 0.37
, lake tahoe
Weight: 0.35
, greenwich village
Weight: 0.34
, town
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be formed 1.00
is formed 0.99
be formed by erosion 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(death valley, be formed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(death valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(death valley, be formed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(valley, be formed)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(valley, is formed)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(valley, is formed)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(valley, is formed)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(valley, is formed)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(valley, be formed by erosion)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(valley, be formed by erosion)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(valley, be formed by erosion)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(valley, be formed by erosion)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(valley, be formed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(valley, be formed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(death valley, be formed)