death valley: be formed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents national park
Weight: 0.69
, park
Weight: 0.68
, area
Weight: 0.66
, location
Weight: 0.64
, site
Weight: 0.62
Siblings valley
Weight: 0.37
, grand canyon
Weight: 0.36
, yellowstone national park
Weight: 0.35
, central park
Weight: 0.35
, rift valley
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be formed 1.00
was formed 0.97

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(park, was formed)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(death valley, be formed)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(national park, was formed)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(death valley, be formed)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(death valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(national park, was formed)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(death valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(park, was formed)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(death valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(national park, was formed)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(death valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(park, was formed)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(death valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(valley, be formed)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(death valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(grand canyon, was formed)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(death valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(yellowstone national park, was formed)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(death valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(rift valley, be formed)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(park, was formed)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(death valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(death valley, be formed)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(national park, was formed)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(death valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(death valley, be formed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(death valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(rift valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(rift valley, be formed)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(death valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(valley, be formed)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(death valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(grand canyon, was formed)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(grand canyon, was formed)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(death valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(yellowstone national park, was formed)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(yellowstone national park, was formed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(death valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(death valley, be formed)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(death valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(death valley, was formed)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(death valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(death valley, was formed)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(death valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(death valley, was formed)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(death valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(death valley, was formed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(death valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(death valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(death valley, be formed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(death valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(death valley, be formed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(death valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(national park, was formed)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(death valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(park, was formed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(death valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(rift valley, be formed)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(death valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(valley, be formed)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(death valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(grand canyon, was formed)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(death valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(yellowstone national park, was formed)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(death valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(national park, was formed)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(death valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(park, was formed)