van: is best shoes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents motor vehicle
Weight: 0.69
, vehicle
Weight: 0.67
, trailer
Weight: 0.60
, artist
Weight: 0.56
Siblings caravan
Weight: 0.57
, pickup truck
Weight: 0.40
, truck
Weight: 0.38
, car
Weight: 0.38
, semi truck
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
is best shoes 1.00
is good shoes 0.96
have shoes 0.93
has state shoes 0.90
have expensive shoes 0.90
is best skate shoes 0.85
is good skate shoes 0.82
have expensive in australia shoes 0.81
is skate shoes 0.80
have called vans shoes 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(van, is best shoes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(van, is best shoes)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(van, is best shoes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(van, is best skate shoes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(van, is best shoes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(van, is best skate shoes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(van, is best shoes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(van, is good skate shoes)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(van, is best shoes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(van, is good skate shoes)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(van, is best shoes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(van, is best skate shoes)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(van, is best shoes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(van, is good skate shoes)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(van, is best shoes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(van, have called vans shoes)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(van, is best shoes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(van, have called vans shoes)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(van, is best shoes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(van, is best skate shoes)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(van, is best shoes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(van, is good skate shoes)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(van, is best shoes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(van, have called vans shoes)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(van, is best shoes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(van, have called vans shoes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(van, is best shoes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(van, is best shoes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(van, is best shoes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(van, is best shoes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(van, is best shoes)