variation: be beneficial to population of organisms

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents problem
Weight: 0.64
, factor
Weight: 0.58
, amplitude
Weight: 0.58
, form
Weight: 0.57
, concept
Weight: 0.56
Siblings polymorphism
Weight: 0.66
, version
Weight: 0.63
, mutation
Weight: 0.58
, error
Weight: 0.58
, plural
Weight: 0.45

Related properties

Property Similarity
be beneficial to population of organisms 1.00
be in organisms important 0.89
be important to organisms 0.89
be important in population of species 0.89
be beneficial to species 0.89
be beneficial for species 0.88
be in organisms 0.87
occur in organisms 0.86
exist in organisms 0.85
be important to organisms survival 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(variation, be beneficial to population of organisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(variation, be beneficial to population of organisms)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(variation, be beneficial to population of organisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(variation, be in organisms)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(variation, be beneficial to population of organisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(variation, be in organisms important)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(variation, be beneficial to population of organisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(variation, be in organisms)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(variation, be beneficial to population of organisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(variation, be beneficial to species)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(variation, be beneficial to population of organisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(variation, be in organisms)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(variation, be beneficial to population of organisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(variation, be important in population of species)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(variation, be beneficial to population of organisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(variation, be important to organisms survival)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(variation, be beneficial to population of organisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(variation, be important to organisms)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(variation, be beneficial to population of organisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(variation, be beneficial for species)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(variation, be beneficial to population of organisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(variation, be in organisms important)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(variation, be beneficial to population of organisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(variation, be in organisms important)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(variation, be beneficial to population of organisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(variation, be in organisms important)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(variation, be beneficial to population of organisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(variation, be in organisms)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(variation, be beneficial to population of organisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(variation, be important to organisms)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(variation, be beneficial to population of organisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(variation, be important to organisms)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(variation, be beneficial to population of organisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(variation, be important in population of species)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(variation, be beneficial to population of organisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(variation, be beneficial for species)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(variation, be beneficial to population of organisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(variation, be important to organisms)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(variation, be beneficial to population of organisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(variation, be beneficial to species)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(variation, be beneficial to population of organisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(variation, be important in population of species)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(variation, be beneficial to population of organisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(variation, be important in population of species)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(variation, be beneficial to population of organisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(variation, be important to organisms survival)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(variation, be beneficial to population of organisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(variation, be beneficial for species)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(variation, be beneficial to population of organisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(variation, be beneficial for species)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(variation, be beneficial to population of organisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(variation, be beneficial to species)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(variation, be beneficial to population of organisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(variation, be beneficial to species)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(variation, be beneficial to population of organisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(variation, be important to organisms survival)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(variation, be beneficial to population of organisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(variation, be important to organisms survival)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(variation, be beneficial to population of organisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(variation, be beneficial to population of organisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(variation, be beneficial to population of organisms)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(variation, be beneficial to population of organisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(variation, be beneficial to population of organisms)