vertebrate: be more complex than invertebrates

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents organism
Weight: 0.69
, species
Weight: 0.58
, chordate
Weight: 0.58
, phylum
Weight: 0.57
, invertebrate
Weight: 0.54
Siblings amphibian
Weight: 0.65
, salamander
Weight: 0.63
, human cell
Weight: 0.62
, lamprey
Weight: 0.47
, diatom
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more complex than invertebrates 1.00
be better than invertebrates 0.94
be larger than invertebrates 0.94
be much larger than invertebrates 0.93
be bigger than invertebrates 0.93
be more endangered than invertebrates 0.92
be different from invertebrates 0.92
be like invertebrates 0.91
grow larger than invertebrates 0.91
be smarter than invertebrates 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrates)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(vertebrate, be different from invertebrates)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, be bigger than invertebrates)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, be better than invertebrates)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, be larger than invertebrates)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, be much larger than invertebrates)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, be more endangered than invertebrates)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, grow larger than invertebrates)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, be like invertebrates)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, be different from invertebrates)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, be smarter than invertebrates)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(vertebrate, be different from invertebrates)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(vertebrate, be different from invertebrates)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(vertebrate, be better than invertebrates)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(vertebrate, be much larger than invertebrates)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(vertebrate, grow larger than invertebrates)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(vertebrate, be better than invertebrates)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(vertebrate, be larger than invertebrates)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(vertebrate, be larger than invertebrates)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(vertebrate, be like invertebrates)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(vertebrate, be better than invertebrates)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(vertebrate, be like invertebrates)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(vertebrate, be much larger than invertebrates)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(vertebrate, be larger than invertebrates)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(vertebrate, grow larger than invertebrates)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(vertebrate, grow larger than invertebrates)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(vertebrate, be much larger than invertebrates)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(vertebrate, be like invertebrates)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(vertebrate, be bigger than invertebrates)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(vertebrate, be smarter than invertebrates)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(vertebrate, be more endangered than invertebrates)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(vertebrate, be smarter than invertebrates)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(vertebrate, be smarter than invertebrates)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(vertebrate, be bigger than invertebrates)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(vertebrate, be more endangered than invertebrates)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(vertebrate, be bigger than invertebrates)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(vertebrate, be more endangered than invertebrates)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrates)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(vertebrate, be more complex than invertebrates)