veterinarian: need calculus

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.62
, specialist
Weight: 0.61
, scientist
Weight: 0.61
Siblings vet
Weight: 0.36
, physician
Weight: 0.35
, biologist
Weight: 0.34
, dentist
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
need calculus 1.00
need math 0.82
use math 0.79
use equations 0.76
use mathematics determine 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(veterinarian, need calculus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(biologist, use math)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(veterinarian, need calculus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(biologist, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(biologist, use math)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(veterinarian, need calculus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(veterinarian, need calculus)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(veterinarian, need calculus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(veterinarian, need math)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(veterinarian, need calculus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(veterinarian, use math)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(veterinarian, need calculus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(veterinarian, use equations)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(veterinarian, need calculus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(veterinarian, use mathematics determine)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(veterinarian, need calculus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(veterinarian, use equations)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(veterinarian, need calculus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(veterinarian, use math)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(veterinarian, need calculus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(veterinarian, use mathematics determine)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(veterinarian, need calculus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(veterinarian, need math)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(veterinarian, need calculus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(veterinarian, need math)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(veterinarian, need calculus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(veterinarian, use equations)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(veterinarian, need calculus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(veterinarian, need math)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(veterinarian, need calculus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(veterinarian, use math)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(veterinarian, need calculus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(veterinarian, use mathematics determine)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(veterinarian, need calculus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(veterinarian, use equations)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(veterinarian, need calculus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(veterinarian, use math)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(veterinarian, need calculus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(veterinarian, use mathematics determine)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(veterinarian, need calculus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(veterinarian, need calculus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(veterinarian, need calculus)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(veterinarian, need calculus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(veterinarian, need calculus)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(veterinarian, need calculus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(biologist, use math)