veterinarian: use math

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.62
, specialist
Weight: 0.61
, scientist
Weight: 0.61
Siblings vet
Weight: 0.36
, physician
Weight: 0.35
, biologist
Weight: 0.34
, dentist
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
use math 1.00
need math 0.96
use mathematics determine 0.86
need calculus 0.79
use geometry 0.75
need physics 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(veterinarian, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(biologist, use math)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(veterinarian, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(biologist, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(biologist, use math)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(veterinarian, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(veterinarian, use math)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(veterinarian, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(veterinarian, need math)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(veterinarian, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(veterinarian, need calculus)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(veterinarian, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(veterinarian, need math)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(veterinarian, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(veterinarian, use mathematics determine)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(veterinarian, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(veterinarian, need physics)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(veterinarian, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(veterinarian, use mathematics determine)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(veterinarian, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(veterinarian, use mathematics determine)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(veterinarian, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(veterinarian, use mathematics determine)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(veterinarian, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(veterinarian, need calculus)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(veterinarian, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(veterinarian, use geometry)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(veterinarian, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(veterinarian, need math)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(veterinarian, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(veterinarian, need physics)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(veterinarian, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(veterinarian, use geometry)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(veterinarian, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(veterinarian, use geometry)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(veterinarian, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(veterinarian, use geometry)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(veterinarian, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(veterinarian, need calculus)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(veterinarian, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(veterinarian, need physics)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(veterinarian, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(veterinarian, need math)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(veterinarian, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(veterinarian, need physics)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(veterinarian, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(veterinarian, need calculus)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(veterinarian, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(veterinarian, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(veterinarian, use math)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(veterinarian, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(veterinarian, use math)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(veterinarian, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(biologist, use math)