veterinarian: need physics

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.62
, specialist
Weight: 0.61
, scientist
Weight: 0.61
Siblings vet
Weight: 0.36
, physician
Weight: 0.35
, biologist
Weight: 0.34
, dentist
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
need physics 1.00
need math 0.78
use mathematics determine 0.75
use math 0.75
use equations 0.75
use geometry 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(veterinarian, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(biologist, use math)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(veterinarian, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(biologist, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(biologist, use math)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(veterinarian, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(veterinarian, need physics)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(veterinarian, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(veterinarian, use mathematics determine)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(veterinarian, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(veterinarian, use math)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(veterinarian, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(veterinarian, use equations)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(veterinarian, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(veterinarian, use geometry)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(veterinarian, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(veterinarian, need math)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(veterinarian, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(veterinarian, use equations)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(veterinarian, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(veterinarian, use mathematics determine)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(veterinarian, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(veterinarian, use geometry)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(veterinarian, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(veterinarian, use math)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(veterinarian, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(veterinarian, need math)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(veterinarian, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(veterinarian, use equations)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(veterinarian, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(veterinarian, need math)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(veterinarian, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(veterinarian, need math)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(veterinarian, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(veterinarian, use geometry)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(veterinarian, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(veterinarian, use mathematics determine)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(veterinarian, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(veterinarian, use math)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(veterinarian, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(veterinarian, use equations)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(veterinarian, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(veterinarian, use geometry)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(veterinarian, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(veterinarian, use math)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(veterinarian, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(veterinarian, use mathematics determine)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(veterinarian, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(veterinarian, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(veterinarian, need physics)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(veterinarian, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(veterinarian, need physics)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(veterinarian, need physics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(biologist, use math)