video: compare to audio

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents demo
Weight: 0.65
, electronic device
Weight: 0.63
, digital camera
Weight: 0.62
, demonstration
Weight: 0.62
Siblings television show
Weight: 0.68
, television series
Weight: 0.62
, minute
Weight: 0.61
, webcam
Weight: 0.58
, tube
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
compare to audio 1.00
be with audio 0.92
improve audio 0.89
be with audio load 0.85
be slower than audio 0.83
be transformed into audio 0.81
is playback 0.77
is video 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(electronic device, improve audio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(video, compare to audio)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(demonstration, is video) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(video, compare to audio)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(video, compare to audio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(demonstration, is video)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(video, compare to audio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(electronic device, improve audio)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(video, compare to audio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(demonstration, is video)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(video, compare to audio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(electronic device, improve audio)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(video, compare to audio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(tube, is video)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(electronic device, improve audio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(video, compare to audio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(video, compare to audio)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(demonstration, is video) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(video, compare to audio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(video, compare to audio)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(video, compare to audio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(tube, is video) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(tube, is video)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(video, compare to audio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(video, compare to audio)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(video, compare to audio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(video, be transformed into audio)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(video, compare to audio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(video, be transformed into audio)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(video, compare to audio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(video, be transformed into audio)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(video, compare to audio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(video, be transformed into audio)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(video, compare to audio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(video, compare to audio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(video, compare to audio)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(video, compare to audio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(video, compare to audio)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(video, compare to audio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(demonstration, is video)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(video, compare to audio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(electronic device, improve audio)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(video, compare to audio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(tube, is video)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(video, compare to audio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(demonstration, is video)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(video, compare to audio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(electronic device, improve audio)