vision: be important in planning

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents quality
Weight: 0.67
, ability
Weight: 0.63
, example
Weight: 0.61
, element
Weight: 0.60
, technology
Weight: 0.60
Siblings ambition
Weight: 0.35
, passion
Weight: 0.35
, dedication
Weight: 0.34
, commitment
Weight: 0.34
, creativity
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in planning 1.00
be important in business 0.76
be important top management formulate 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(quality, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(vision, be important in planning)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(vision, be important in planning)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(quality, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(vision, be important in planning)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(quality, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(vision, be important in planning)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(ambition, be important in business)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(vision, be important in planning)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(passion, be important in business)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(vision, be important in planning)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(creativity, be important in business)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(vision, be important in planning)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(commitment, be important in business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(quality, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(vision, be important in planning)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(vision, be important in planning)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(vision, be important in planning)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(commitment, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(commitment, be important in business)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(vision, be important in planning)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(creativity, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(creativity, be important in business)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(vision, be important in planning)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(ambition, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(ambition, be important in business)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(vision, be important in planning)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(passion, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(passion, be important in business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(vision, be important in planning)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(vision, be important in planning)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(vision, be important in planning)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(vision, be important in business)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(vision, be important in planning)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(vision, be important in business)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(vision, be important in planning)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(vision, be important in business)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(vision, be important in planning)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(vision, be important top management formulate)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(vision, be important in planning)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(vision, be important top management formulate)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(vision, be important in planning)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(vision, be important in business)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(vision, be important in planning)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(vision, be important top management formulate)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(vision, be important in planning)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(vision, be important top management formulate)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(vision, be important in planning)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(vision, be important in planning)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(vision, be important in planning)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(vision, be important in planning)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(vision, be important in planning)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(vision, be important in planning)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(quality, be important in business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(vision, be important in planning)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(commitment, be important in business)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(vision, be important in planning)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(creativity, be important in business)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(vision, be important in planning)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(ambition, be important in business)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(vision, be important in planning)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(passion, be important in business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(vision, be important in planning)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(quality, be important in business)