visit: were to first part

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents meeting
Weight: 0.64
, service
Weight: 0.61
, mission
Weight: 0.58
, event
Weight: 0.58
, topic
Weight: 0.58
Siblings hospital visit
Weight: 0.37
, tour
Weight: 0.33
, escort service
Weight: 0.33
, encounter
Weight: 0.32
, wedding reception
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
were to first part 1.00
were to part 0.91
were were created in first place 0.88
were to first part stopped 0.88
were were created in place 0.80
were to part stopped 0.79
was founed 0.79
were made 0.78
is last year 0.78
were were created 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(mission, were were created in first place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(visit, were to first part)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(mission, were made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(visit, were to first part)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(mission, was founed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(visit, were to first part)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(visit, were to first part) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(mission, was founed)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(visit, were to first part) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(mission, were were created in first place)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(visit, were to first part) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(mission, were made)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(visit, were to first part) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(mission, was founed)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(visit, were to first part) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(mission, were were created in first place)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(visit, were to first part) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(mission, were made)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(visit, were to first part) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(tour, is last year)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(mission, were were created in first place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(visit, were to first part) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(visit, were to first part)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(mission, were made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(visit, were to first part) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(visit, were to first part)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(mission, was founed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(visit, were to first part) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(visit, were to first part)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(visit, were to first part) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(tour, is last year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(tour, is last year)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(visit, were to first part) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(visit, were to first part)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(visit, were to first part) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(visit, were to part)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(visit, were to first part) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(visit, were to part)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(visit, were to first part) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(visit, were to part)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(visit, were to first part) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(visit, were to first part stopped)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(visit, were to first part) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(visit, were to first part stopped)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(visit, were to first part) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(visit, were to part)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(visit, were to first part) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(visit, were to part stopped)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(visit, were to first part) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(visit, were to part stopped)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(visit, were to first part) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(visit, were to first part stopped)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(visit, were to first part) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(visit, were to part stopped)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(visit, were to first part) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(visit, were to part stopped)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(visit, were to first part) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(visit, were to first part stopped)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(visit, were to first part) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(visit, were to first part) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(visit, were to first part)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(visit, were to first part) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(visit, were to first part)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(visit, were to first part) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(mission, was founed)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(visit, were to first part) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(mission, were made)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(visit, were to first part) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(mission, were were created in first place)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(visit, were to first part) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(tour, is last year)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(visit, were to first part) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(mission, was founed)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(visit, were to first part) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(mission, were made)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(visit, were to first part) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(mission, were were created in first place)