visit: were to part

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents meeting
Weight: 0.64
, service
Weight: 0.61
, mission
Weight: 0.58
, event
Weight: 0.58
, topic
Weight: 0.58
Siblings hospital visit
Weight: 0.37
, tour
Weight: 0.33
, escort service
Weight: 0.33
, encounter
Weight: 0.32
, wedding reception
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
were to part 1.00
were to first part 0.91
were were created in place 0.85
were were created in first place 0.85
were were created 0.84
were to part stopped 0.83
were to first part stopped 0.83
were made 0.83
were different from presidios 0.80
was founed 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(mission, were were created in first place)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(visit, were to part)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(mission, were made)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(visit, were to part)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(mission, were different from presidios)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(visit, were to part)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(mission, was founed)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(visit, were to part)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(visit, were to part)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(mission, was founed)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(visit, were to part)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(mission, were different from presidios)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(visit, were to part)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(mission, were made)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(visit, were to part)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(mission, were were created in first place)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(visit, were to part)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(mission, was founed)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(visit, were to part)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(mission, were different from presidios)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(visit, were to part)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(mission, were made)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(visit, were to part)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(mission, were were created in first place)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(mission, were were created in first place)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(visit, were to part)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(visit, were to part)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(mission, were made)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(visit, were to part)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(visit, were to part)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(mission, were different from presidios)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(visit, were to part)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(visit, were to part)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(mission, was founed)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(visit, were to part)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(visit, were to part)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(visit, were to part)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(visit, were to part)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(visit, were to part)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(visit, were to first part)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(visit, were to part)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(visit, were to first part stopped)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(visit, were to part)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(visit, were to part stopped)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(visit, were to part)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(visit, were to part stopped)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(visit, were to part)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(visit, were to first part stopped)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(visit, were to part)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(visit, were to first part)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(visit, were to part)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(visit, were to part stopped)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(visit, were to part)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(visit, were to part stopped)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(visit, were to part)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(visit, were to first part)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(visit, were to part)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(visit, were to first part stopped)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(visit, were to part)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(visit, were to first part)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(visit, were to part)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(visit, were to first part stopped)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(visit, were to part)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(visit, were to part)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(visit, were to part)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(visit, were to part)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(visit, were to part)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(visit, were to part)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(mission, was founed)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(visit, were to part)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(mission, were different from presidios)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(visit, were to part)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(mission, were made)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(visit, were to part)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(mission, were were created in first place)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(visit, were to part)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(mission, was founed)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(visit, were to part)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(mission, were different from presidios)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(visit, were to part)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(mission, were made)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(visit, were to part)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(mission, were were created in first place)