voice: be at band

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents loud noise
Weight: 0.65
, channel
Weight: 0.64
, platform
Weight: 0.63
, element
Weight: 0.63
Siblings microphone
Weight: 0.63
, dialect
Weight: 0.51
, loud music
Weight: 0.36
, tone
Weight: 0.33
, scream
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at band 1.00
be at concert 0.77
be at song 0.76
be at choir 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(voice, be at band)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(loud music, be at concert)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(voice, be at band)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(microphone, be at concert)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(voice, be at band)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(microphone, be at concert)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(microphone, be at concert)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(voice, be at band)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(loud music, be at concert)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(loud music, be at concert)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(voice, be at band)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(voice, be at band)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(voice, be at band)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(voice, be at choir)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(voice, be at band)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(voice, be at song)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(voice, be at band)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(voice, be at choir)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(voice, be at band)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(voice, be at choir)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(voice, be at band)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(voice, be at choir)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(voice, be at band)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(voice, be at song)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(voice, be at band)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(voice, be at song)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(voice, be at band)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(voice, be at song)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(voice, be at band)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(voice, be at band)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(voice, be at band)

Typical implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(voice, be at band)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(voice, be at band)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(voice, be at band)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(microphone, be at concert)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(voice, be at band)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(loud music, be at concert)