voice: be at choir

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents loud noise
Weight: 0.65
, channel
Weight: 0.64
, platform
Weight: 0.63
, element
Weight: 0.63
Siblings microphone
Weight: 0.63
, dialect
Weight: 0.51
, loud music
Weight: 0.36
, tone
Weight: 0.33
, scream
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at choir 1.00
be at concert hall 0.75
be at band 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.18
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(platform, be at concert hall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(voice, be at choir)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(voice, be at choir) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(platform, be at concert hall)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(voice, be at choir) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(platform, be at concert hall)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(voice, be at choir) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(microphone, be at concert hall)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(platform, be at concert hall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(voice, be at choir) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(voice, be at choir)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(voice, be at choir) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(microphone, be at concert hall) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(microphone, be at concert hall)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(voice, be at choir) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(voice, be at choir)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(voice, be at choir) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(voice, be at band)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(voice, be at choir) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(voice, be at band)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(voice, be at choir) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(voice, be at band)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(voice, be at choir) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(voice, be at band)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(voice, be at choir) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(voice, be at choir) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(voice, be at choir)

Typical implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(voice, be at choir) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(voice, be at choir)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(voice, be at choir) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(platform, be at concert hall)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(voice, be at choir) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(microphone, be at concert hall)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(voice, be at choir) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(platform, be at concert hall)