voice: be at record studio

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents loud noise
Weight: 0.65
, channel
Weight: 0.64
, platform
Weight: 0.63
, element
Weight: 0.63
Siblings microphone
Weight: 0.63
, dialect
Weight: 0.51
, loud music
Weight: 0.36
, tone
Weight: 0.33
, scream
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at record studio 1.00
be at radio studio 0.86
be used to record 0.83
record that sound 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(voice, be at record studio)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(microphone, be at radio studio)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(voice, be at record studio)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(microphone, record that sound)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(voice, be at record studio)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(microphone, be at radio studio)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(microphone, be at radio studio)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(voice, be at record studio)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(microphone, record that sound)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(microphone, record that sound)

Salient implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(voice, be at record studio)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(voice, be at record studio)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(voice, be at record studio)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(voice, be used to record)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(voice, be at record studio)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(voice, be used to record)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(voice, be at record studio)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(voice, be used to record)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(voice, be at record studio)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(voice, be used to record)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(voice, be at record studio)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(voice, be at record studio)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(voice, be at record studio)

Typical implies Plausible

0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(voice, be at record studio)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(voice, be at record studio)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(voice, be at record studio)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(microphone, record that sound)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(voice, be at record studio)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(microphone, be at radio studio)