volleyball: is good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tennis court
Weight: 0.65
, game
Weight: 0.61
, athlete
Weight: 0.60
, sport
Weight: 0.60
, swimming pool
Weight: 0.59
Siblings softball
Weight: 0.54
, basketball court
Weight: 0.38
, tennis game
Weight: 0.37
, tennis player
Weight: 0.37
, hockey game
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is good 1.00
is great 0.88
has quality good 0.87
is hard 0.77
is good exercise 0.77
have good impact 0.76
be considered good exercise 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(swimming pool, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(volleyball, is good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(game, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(volleyball, is good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(game, is hard)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(volleyball, is good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(sport, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(volleyball, is good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(volleyball, is good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(sport, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(volleyball, is good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(game, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(volleyball, is good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(swimming pool, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(volleyball, is good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(game, is hard)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(volleyball, is good)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(swimming pool, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(volleyball, is good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(game, is hard)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(volleyball, is good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(game, has quality good)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(volleyball, is good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(sport, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(volleyball, is good)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(softball, is hard)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(volleyball, is good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(softball, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(swimming pool, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(volleyball, is good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(volleyball, is good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(game, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(volleyball, is good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(volleyball, is good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(sport, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(volleyball, is good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(volleyball, is good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(game, is hard)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(volleyball, is good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(volleyball, is good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(volleyball, is good)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(softball, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(softball, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(volleyball, is good)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(softball, is hard)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(softball, is hard)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(volleyball, is good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(volleyball, is good)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(volleyball, is good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(volleyball, has quality good)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(volleyball, is good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(volleyball, has quality good)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(volleyball, is good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(volleyball, has quality good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(volleyball, is good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(volleyball, is good exercise)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(volleyball, is good)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(volleyball, have good impact)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(volleyball, is good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(volleyball, is hard)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(volleyball, is good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(volleyball, have good impact)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(volleyball, is good)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(volleyball, is good exercise)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(volleyball, is good)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(volleyball, have good impact)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(volleyball, is good)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(volleyball, is good exercise)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(volleyball, is good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(volleyball, is hard)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(volleyball, is good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(volleyball, is hard)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(volleyball, is good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(volleyball, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(volleyball, is good)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(volleyball, is hard)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(volleyball, is good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(volleyball, is good exercise)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(volleyball, is good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(volleyball, have good impact)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(volleyball, is good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(volleyball, is good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(volleyball, is good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(volleyball, is good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(volleyball, is good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(volleyball, is good)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(sport, has quality good)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(volleyball, is good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(game, has quality good)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(volleyball, is good)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(swimming pool, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(volleyball, is good)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(game, is hard)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(volleyball, is good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(softball, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(volleyball, is good)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(softball, is hard)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(volleyball, is good)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(sport, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(volleyball, is good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(game, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(volleyball, is good)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(swimming pool, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(volleyball, is good)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(game, is hard)