volume: is inversely related

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents variable
Weight: 0.67
, device
Weight: 0.64
, parameter
Weight: 0.63
, indicator
Weight: 0.62
, book
Weight: 0.58
Siblings aggregate
Weight: 0.50
, quiet
Weight: 0.47
, frequency
Weight: 0.34
, density
Weight: 0.34
, throughput
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is inversely related 1.00
is inversely proportional 0.92
be inversely proportional 0.92
be inversely proportional to pressure 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(volume, is inversely related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(frequency, be inversely proportional)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(volume, is inversely related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(frequency, be inversely proportional) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(frequency, be inversely proportional)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(volume, is inversely related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(volume, is inversely related)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(volume, is inversely related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(volume, be inversely proportional)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(volume, is inversely related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(volume, be inversely proportional)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(volume, is inversely related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(volume, be inversely proportional)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(volume, is inversely related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(volume, be inversely proportional)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(volume, is inversely related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(volume, is inversely related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(volume, is inversely related)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(volume, is inversely related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(volume, is inversely related)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(volume, is inversely related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(frequency, be inversely proportional)