waffle: has quality good

Related concepts

Parents	dish Weight: 0.63 , item Weight: 0.62 , thing Weight: 0.57 , bread Weight: 0.56 , product Weight: 0.54
Siblings	spaghetti sauce Weight: 0.36 , sausage Weight: 0.36 , chocolate cake Weight: 0.36 , custard Weight: 0.35 , potato salad Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality good	1.00
has quality change	0.86
taste good	0.79
taste good together	0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.14

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(bread, taste good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(waffle, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(waffle, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Plausible(bread, taste good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(waffle, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(bread, taste good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(waffle, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(potato salad, has quality good)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(waffle, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(sausage, has quality good)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(waffle, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(custard, has quality good)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(waffle, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(chocolate cake, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(bread, taste good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

Remarkable(waffle, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Plausible(waffle, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(waffle, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

Remarkable(chocolate cake, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Plausible(chocolate cake, has quality good)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(waffle, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

Remarkable(custard, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Plausible(custard, has quality good)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(waffle, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

Remarkable(sausage, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Plausible(sausage, has quality good)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(waffle, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

Remarkable(potato salad, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Plausible(potato salad, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(waffle, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Salient(waffle, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.94

Salient(waffle, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Salient(waffle, has quality change)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(waffle, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Plausible(waffle, has quality change)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.87

Typical(waffle, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(waffle, has quality change)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.72

Remarkable(waffle, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(waffle, has quality change)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.94

Salient(waffle, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Salient(waffle, taste good)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.94

Salient(waffle, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Salient(waffle, taste good together)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.87

Typical(waffle, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(waffle, taste good together)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.87

Typical(waffle, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(waffle, taste good)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(waffle, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(waffle, taste good together)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(waffle, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Plausible(waffle, taste good)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.72

Remarkable(waffle, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(waffle, taste good)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.72

Remarkable(waffle, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(waffle, taste good together)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.94

Salient(waffle, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(waffle, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(waffle, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(waffle, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(waffle, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(waffle, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(bread, taste good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(waffle, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(chocolate cake, has quality good)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(waffle, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(custard, has quality good)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(waffle, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(sausage, has quality good)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(waffle, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(potato salad, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.87

Typical(waffle, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(bread, taste good)