waiter: wear aprons

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents employee
Weight: 0.69
, man
Weight: 0.64
, worker
Weight: 0.63
, job
Weight: 0.62
, restaurant
Weight: 0.59
Siblings bartender
Weight: 0.36
, italian restaurant
Weight: 0.36
, receptionist
Weight: 0.35
, policeman
Weight: 0.35
, seafood restaurant
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
wear aprons 1.00
wear uniforms 0.83
wear white gloves 0.83
wear gloves 0.83
wear vests 0.81
wear white 0.80
wear uniform 0.79
wear black 0.79
wear black armbands 0.79
wear armbands 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(employee, wear uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(waiter, wear aprons)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(waiter, wear aprons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(employee, wear uniforms)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(waiter, wear aprons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(employee, wear uniforms)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(waiter, wear aprons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(policeman, wear black)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(waiter, wear aprons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(bartender, wear black)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(waiter, wear aprons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(bartender, wear vests)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(waiter, wear aprons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(bartender, wear armbands)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(waiter, wear aprons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(policeman, wear uniforms)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(employee, wear uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(waiter, wear aprons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(waiter, wear aprons)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(waiter, wear aprons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(policeman, wear uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(policeman, wear uniforms)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(waiter, wear aprons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(bartender, wear vests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(bartender, wear vests)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(waiter, wear aprons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(bartender, wear armbands) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(bartender, wear armbands)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(waiter, wear aprons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(bartender, wear black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(bartender, wear black)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(waiter, wear aprons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(policeman, wear black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(policeman, wear black)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(waiter, wear aprons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(waiter, wear aprons)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(waiter, wear aprons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(waiter, wear black)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(waiter, wear aprons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(waiter, wear uniforms)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(waiter, wear aprons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(waiter, wear white gloves)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(waiter, wear aprons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(waiter, wear uniforms)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(waiter, wear aprons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(waiter, wear white)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(waiter, wear aprons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(waiter, wear aprons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(waiter, wear aprons)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(waiter, wear aprons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(waiter, wear aprons)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(waiter, wear aprons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(employee, wear uniforms)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(waiter, wear aprons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(policeman, wear uniforms)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(waiter, wear aprons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(bartender, wear armbands)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(waiter, wear aprons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(bartender, wear vests)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(waiter, wear aprons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(bartender, wear black)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(waiter, wear aprons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(policeman, wear black)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(waiter, wear aprons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(employee, wear uniforms)