waitress: be at bar

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents woman
Weight: 0.66
, people
Weight: 0.55
, server
Weight: 0.55
, public servant
Weight: 0.54
, food
Weight: 0.54
Siblings old woman
Weight: 0.36
, receptionist
Weight: 0.36
, pregnant woman
Weight: 0.36
, grandmother
Weight: 0.36
, maid
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at bar 1.00
be at in restaurant 0.79
be at fast-food restaurant 0.79
be at restaurant 0.79
be find in restaurant 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(woman, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(waitress, be at bar)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(food, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(waitress, be at bar)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(food, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(waitress, be at bar)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(food, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(waitress, be at bar)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(food, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(waitress, be at bar)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(waitress, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(woman, be at bar)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(waitress, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(food, be at restaurant)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(waitress, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(food, be at restaurant)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(waitress, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(food, be at in restaurant)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(waitress, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(food, be at fast-food restaurant)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(waitress, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(woman, be at bar)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(waitress, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(food, be at in restaurant)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(waitress, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(food, be at restaurant)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(waitress, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(food, be at restaurant)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(waitress, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(food, be at fast-food restaurant)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(woman, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(waitress, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(waitress, be at bar)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(food, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(waitress, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(waitress, be at bar)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(food, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(waitress, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(waitress, be at bar)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(food, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(waitress, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(waitress, be at bar)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(food, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(waitress, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(waitress, be at bar)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(waitress, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(waitress, be at bar)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(waitress, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(waitress, be at in restaurant)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(waitress, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(waitress, be at in restaurant)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(waitress, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(waitress, be at in restaurant)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(waitress, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(waitress, be at in restaurant)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(waitress, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(waitress, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(waitress, be at bar)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(waitress, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(waitress, be at bar)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(waitress, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(woman, be at bar)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(waitress, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(food, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(waitress, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(food, be at in restaurant)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(waitress, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(food, be at restaurant)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(waitress, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(food, be at restaurant)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(waitress, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(food, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(waitress, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(food, be at in restaurant)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(waitress, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(food, be at restaurant)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(waitress, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(food, be at restaurant)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(waitress, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(woman, be at bar)