waitress: is babies

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents woman
Weight: 0.66
, server
Weight: 0.55
, food
Weight: 0.54
, person
Weight: 0.53
Siblings old woman
Weight: 0.36
, pregnant woman
Weight: 0.36
, grandmother
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is babies 1.00
is fucking babies 0.89
is whining babies 0.82
is whining fucking babies 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(waitress, is babies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(waitress, is babies)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(waitress, is babies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(waitress, is fucking babies)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(waitress, is babies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(waitress, is fucking babies)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(waitress, is babies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(waitress, is fucking babies)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(waitress, is babies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(waitress, is whining babies)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(waitress, is babies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(waitress, is whining babies)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(waitress, is babies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(waitress, is whining babies)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(waitress, is babies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(waitress, is whining fucking babies)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(waitress, is babies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(waitress, is whining fucking babies)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(waitress, is babies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(waitress, is whining fucking babies)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(waitress, is babies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(waitress, is fucking babies)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(waitress, is babies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(waitress, is whining babies)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(waitress, is babies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(waitress, is whining fucking babies)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(waitress, is babies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(waitress, is babies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(waitress, is babies)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(waitress, is babies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(waitress, is babies)