waitress: is whining fucking babies

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents woman
Weight: 0.66
, server
Weight: 0.55
, food
Weight: 0.54
, person
Weight: 0.53
Siblings old woman
Weight: 0.36
, pregnant woman
Weight: 0.36
, grandmother
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is whining fucking babies 1.00
is whining babies 0.97
is fucking babies 0.92
is babies 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(waitress, is whining fucking babies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(waitress, is whining fucking babies)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(waitress, is whining fucking babies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(waitress, is whining babies)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(waitress, is whining fucking babies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(waitress, is whining babies)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(waitress, is whining fucking babies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(waitress, is whining babies)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(waitress, is whining fucking babies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(waitress, is fucking babies)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(waitress, is whining fucking babies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(waitress, is fucking babies)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(waitress, is whining fucking babies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(waitress, is fucking babies)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(waitress, is whining fucking babies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(waitress, is whining babies)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(waitress, is whining fucking babies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(waitress, is babies)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(waitress, is whining fucking babies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(waitress, is fucking babies)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(waitress, is whining fucking babies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(waitress, is babies)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(waitress, is whining fucking babies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(waitress, is babies)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(waitress, is whining fucking babies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(waitress, is babies)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(waitress, is whining fucking babies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(waitress, is whining fucking babies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(waitress, is whining fucking babies)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(waitress, is whining fucking babies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(waitress, is whining fucking babies)