waitress: wear aprons

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents woman
Weight: 0.66
, server
Weight: 0.55
, food
Weight: 0.54
, person
Weight: 0.53
Siblings old woman
Weight: 0.36
, pregnant woman
Weight: 0.36
, grandmother
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
wear aprons 1.00
wear skirts 0.81
wear white 0.80
wear pants 0.80
wear black 0.79
wear short skirts 0.78
is uniforms 0.78
uniforms 0.78
wear tight pants 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(woman, wear skirts)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(waitress, wear aprons)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(woman, wear white)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(waitress, wear aprons)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(woman, wear black)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(waitress, wear aprons)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(woman, wear short skirts)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(waitress, wear aprons)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(waitress, wear aprons)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(woman, wear skirts)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(waitress, wear aprons)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(woman, wear white)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(waitress, wear aprons)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(woman, wear black)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(waitress, wear aprons)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(woman, wear short skirts)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(waitress, wear aprons)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(woman, wear skirts)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(waitress, wear aprons)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(woman, wear white)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(waitress, wear aprons)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(woman, wear black)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(waitress, wear aprons)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(woman, wear short skirts)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(waitress, wear aprons)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(old woman, wear black)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(woman, wear skirts)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(waitress, wear aprons)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(waitress, wear aprons)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(woman, wear white)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(waitress, wear aprons)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(waitress, wear aprons)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(woman, wear black)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(waitress, wear aprons)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(waitress, wear aprons)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(woman, wear short skirts)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(waitress, wear aprons)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(waitress, wear aprons)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(waitress, wear aprons)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(old woman, wear black)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(old woman, wear black)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(waitress, wear aprons)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(waitress, wear aprons)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(waitress, wear aprons)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(waitress, uniforms)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(waitress, wear aprons)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(waitress, uniforms)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(waitress, wear aprons)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(waitress, uniforms)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(waitress, wear aprons)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(waitress, is uniforms)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(waitress, wear aprons)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(waitress, is uniforms)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(waitress, wear aprons)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(waitress, is uniforms)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(waitress, wear aprons)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(waitress, is uniforms)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(waitress, wear aprons)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(waitress, uniforms)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(waitress, wear aprons)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(waitress, wear pants)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(waitress, wear aprons)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(waitress, wear short skirts)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(waitress, wear aprons)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(waitress, wear tight pants)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(waitress, wear aprons)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(waitress, wear pants)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(waitress, wear aprons)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(waitress, wear skirts)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(waitress, wear aprons)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(waitress, wear pants)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(waitress, wear aprons)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(waitress, wear black)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(waitress, wear aprons)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(waitress, wear white)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(waitress, wear aprons)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(waitress, wear skirts)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(waitress, wear aprons)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(waitress, wear skirts)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(waitress, wear aprons)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(waitress, wear skirts)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(waitress, wear aprons)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(waitress, wear pants)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(waitress, wear aprons)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(waitress, wear tight pants)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(waitress, wear aprons)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(waitress, wear short skirts)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(waitress, wear aprons)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(waitress, wear tight pants)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(waitress, wear aprons)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(waitress, wear short skirts)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(waitress, wear aprons)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(waitress, wear tight pants)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(waitress, wear aprons)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(waitress, wear black)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(waitress, wear aprons)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(waitress, wear short skirts)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(waitress, wear aprons)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(waitress, wear black)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(waitress, wear aprons)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(waitress, wear white)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(waitress, wear aprons)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(waitress, wear white)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(waitress, wear aprons)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(waitress, wear black)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(waitress, wear aprons)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(waitress, wear white)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(waitress, wear aprons)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(waitress, wear aprons)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(waitress, wear aprons)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(waitress, wear aprons)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(waitress, wear aprons)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(waitress, wear aprons)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(woman, wear skirts)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(waitress, wear aprons)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(woman, wear white)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(waitress, wear aprons)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(woman, wear black)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(waitress, wear aprons)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(woman, wear short skirts)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(waitress, wear aprons)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(old woman, wear black)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.10
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(waitress, wear aprons)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(woman, wear skirts)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(waitress, wear aprons)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(woman, wear white)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(waitress, wear aprons)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(woman, wear black)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(waitress, wear aprons)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(woman, wear short skirts)