waitress: wear pants

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents woman
Weight: 0.66
, server
Weight: 0.55
, food
Weight: 0.54
, person
Weight: 0.53
Siblings old woman
Weight: 0.36
, pregnant woman
Weight: 0.36
, grandmother
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
wear pants 1.00
wear tight pants 0.93
wear skirts 0.86
wear short skirts 0.84
wear black 0.84
wear white 0.84
wear aprons 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(woman, wear skirts)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(waitress, wear pants)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(woman, wear short skirts)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(waitress, wear pants)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(woman, wear black)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(waitress, wear pants)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(woman, wear white)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(waitress, wear pants)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(waitress, wear pants)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(woman, wear skirts)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(waitress, wear pants)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(woman, wear short skirts)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(waitress, wear pants)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(woman, wear black)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(waitress, wear pants)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(woman, wear white)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(waitress, wear pants)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(woman, wear skirts)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(waitress, wear pants)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(woman, wear short skirts)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(waitress, wear pants)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(woman, wear black)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(waitress, wear pants)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(woman, wear white)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(waitress, wear pants)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(old woman, wear black)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(woman, wear skirts)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(waitress, wear pants)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(waitress, wear pants)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(woman, wear short skirts)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(waitress, wear pants)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(waitress, wear pants)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(woman, wear black)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(waitress, wear pants)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(waitress, wear pants)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(woman, wear white)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(waitress, wear pants)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(waitress, wear pants)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(waitress, wear pants)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(old woman, wear black)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(old woman, wear black)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(waitress, wear pants)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(waitress, wear pants)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(waitress, wear pants)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(waitress, wear tight pants)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(waitress, wear pants)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(waitress, wear aprons)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(waitress, wear pants)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(waitress, wear skirts)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(waitress, wear pants)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(waitress, wear aprons)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(waitress, wear pants)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(waitress, wear skirts)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(waitress, wear pants)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(waitress, wear short skirts)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(waitress, wear pants)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(waitress, wear tight pants)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(waitress, wear pants)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(waitress, wear aprons)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(waitress, wear pants)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(waitress, wear tight pants)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(waitress, wear pants)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(waitress, wear skirts)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(waitress, wear pants)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(waitress, wear tight pants)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(waitress, wear pants)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(waitress, wear skirts)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(waitress, wear pants)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(waitress, wear black)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(waitress, wear pants)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(waitress, wear short skirts)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(waitress, wear pants)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(waitress, wear short skirts)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(waitress, wear pants)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(waitress, wear white)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(waitress, wear pants)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(waitress, wear aprons)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(waitress, wear pants)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(waitress, wear short skirts)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(waitress, wear pants)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(waitress, wear black)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(waitress, wear pants)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(waitress, wear black)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(waitress, wear pants)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(waitress, wear white)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(waitress, wear pants)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(waitress, wear white)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(waitress, wear pants)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(waitress, wear black)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(waitress, wear pants)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(waitress, wear white)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(waitress, wear pants)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(waitress, wear pants)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(waitress, wear pants)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(waitress, wear pants)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(waitress, wear pants)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(waitress, wear pants)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(woman, wear skirts)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(waitress, wear pants)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(woman, wear short skirts)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(waitress, wear pants)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(woman, wear black)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(waitress, wear pants)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(woman, wear white)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(waitress, wear pants)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(old woman, wear black)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(waitress, wear pants)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(woman, wear skirts)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(waitress, wear pants)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(woman, wear short skirts)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(waitress, wear pants)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(woman, wear black)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(waitress, wear pants)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(woman, wear white)