walrus: have long teeth

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.66
, mammal
Weight: 0.65
, wildlife
Weight: 0.61
, wild animal
Weight: 0.58
Siblings whale
Weight: 0.37
, humpback whale
Weight: 0.37
, sea otter
Weight: 0.36
, moose
Weight: 0.36
, blue whale
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
have long teeth 1.00
has physical part teeth 0.91
have long tusk like teeth 0.86
have tusk like teeth 0.82
has physical part whiskers 0.78
have long tusks 0.76
has physical part ears 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(walrus, have long teeth)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(walrus, have long teeth)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, has physical part whiskers)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(walrus, have long teeth)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(animal, has physical part whiskers)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(walrus, have long teeth)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(sea otter, has physical part whiskers)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(walrus, have long teeth)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(walrus, have long teeth)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(walrus, have long teeth)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(sea otter, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(sea otter, has physical part whiskers)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(walrus, have long teeth)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(walrus, have long teeth)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(walrus, have long teeth)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(walrus, has physical part whiskers)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(walrus, have long teeth)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(walrus, has physical part whiskers)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(walrus, have long teeth)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(walrus, have long tusk like teeth)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(walrus, have long teeth)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(walrus, have long tusk like teeth)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(walrus, have long teeth)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(walrus, have long tusk like teeth)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(walrus, have long teeth)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(walrus, has physical part whiskers)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(walrus, have long teeth)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(walrus, have long tusk like teeth)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(walrus, have long teeth)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(walrus, have tusk like teeth)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(walrus, have long teeth)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(walrus, has physical part whiskers)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(walrus, have long teeth)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(walrus, have tusk like teeth)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(walrus, have long teeth)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(walrus, have long tusks)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(walrus, have long teeth)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(walrus, have long tusks)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(walrus, have long teeth)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(walrus, have long tusks)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(walrus, have long teeth)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(walrus, have long tusks)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(walrus, have long teeth)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(walrus, have tusk like teeth)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(walrus, have long teeth)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(walrus, have tusk like teeth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(walrus, have long teeth)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(walrus, have long teeth)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(walrus, have long teeth)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(walrus, have long teeth)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(walrus, have long teeth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(walrus, have long teeth)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part whiskers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(walrus, have long teeth)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(sea otter, has physical part whiskers)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(walrus, have long teeth)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part whiskers)